Skip to content
Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree at a glance

· Private foundation

Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$910k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.1MFood & Nutrition$1.0MHealth$780kHuman Services$406kHousing & Shelter$400kReligion$379kEducation$337kEmployment$306kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $877k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT LEAD THE WAY (PLTW)$77,000
COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC$75,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC$75,000
LEAP FOR EDUCATION$50,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$50,000
Pine Street Inn$50,000
CODESQUAD$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METROWEST$50,000
MASSCHALLENGE$50,000
SPOONFULS$50,000
VISIONS INC$50,000
HOPEWELL INC$50,000
SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS$50,000
The Dimock Center$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $796k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPEWELL INC: $50k → 7%HOPEWELL INC: $50k → 7%HOPEWELL INC: $50k → 7%HOPEWELL INC: $25k → 7%PINE STREET INN: $55k → 16%Pine Street Inn: $50k → 16%Pine Street Inn: $31k → 16%Pine Street Inn: $30k → 16%YW Boston: $51k → 16%Asian American Civic Association: $500 → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $90k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $85k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $79k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $75k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $75k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 68 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
49

Total granted

$5.1M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+8%

Still filing today

63%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $780k · revenue +337%
  • COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $404k · revenue +72%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $335k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -29%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue -85%
  • BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Health Resources in Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
78/78
Grantees still filing
61/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $780,000 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $335,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCPROJECT LEAD THE WAY: $301,000 · OtherPROJECT LEAD THE WAYThe Dimock Center: $200,500 · OtherThe Dimock CenterVISIONS INC: $200,000 · OtherVISIONS INCIndividual grant recipient: $165,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHearth Inc: $150,250 · OtherCOMMUNITY BOAT BUILDING: $120,000 · OtherTECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED: $100,000 · OtherMASSCHALLENGE INC: $130,000 · Other+52 more: $335,650 · Other+52 moreCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $404,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVIN…HOPEWELL INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesHOPEWELL INCPINE STREET INN INC: $165,500 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN …YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC: $50,750 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CH…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF …SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $225,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCIENCE CLUB FO…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS …BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CL…+2 more: $20,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC: $180,000 · EducationTHE POSSIB…LEAP for Education Inc: $130,000 · EducationLEAP for E…THE PARTNERSHIP INC: $110,000 · EducationTHE PARTNE…+48 more: $77,350 · Education+48 moreSPOONFULS: $285,000 · Food & NutritionCODESQUAD INC: $195,000 · Employment+1 more: $1,250 · EmploymentTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $151,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PARTNERSHIP INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,817,400Human Services$795,750Youth Development$745,500Education$497,350Food & Nutrition$285,000Employment$196,250Arts & Culture$181,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $780,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $404,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $335,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $325,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSPOONFULS: $285,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $225,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCODESQUAD INC: $195,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetTHE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC: $180,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHOPEWELL INC: $175,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $165,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $151,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMASSCHALLENGE INC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLEAP for Education Inc: $130,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC: $125,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP INC: $110,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetTECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $84,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC: $50,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $33,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetONEGOAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $10,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCURRY COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $3,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $3,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENJAMIN FRANKLIN CUMMINGS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $2,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERRIMACK COLLEGE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CODESQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MASSCHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAP for Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CURRY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…Boston Foundation IncCummings Foundation G…Liberty Mutual Founda…United Way Of Massach…Amelia Peabody Founda…Fidelity FoundationState Street Foundati…The New England Patri…Rockland Trust Charit…The Lynch FoundationWilliam E Schrafft an…
Eastern Bank FoundationMA33.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Amelia Peabody Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · State Street Foundation Inc · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Lynch Foundation · William E Schrafft and Bertha E Schrafft Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Hopewell Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Asian American Civic Association Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Sociedad Latina Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tech Goes Home Incorporated: 10% of income from government
  • Leap for Education Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology: 5% of income from government
  • Masschallenge Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Childrens Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Springfield College: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
  • Endicott College: 1% of income from government
  • Merrimack College: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Assumption University: 0% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Curry College: 0% of income from government
  • The Possible Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Nichols College: 0% of income from government
  • Saint Michael's College: 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Stonehill College Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Emerson College: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home