· Private foundation
Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $33k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $877k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT LEAD THE WAY (PLTW) | $77,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC | $75,000 |
| COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC | $75,000 |
| SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS | $50,000 |
| LEAP FOR EDUCATION | $50,000 |
| CODESQUAD | $50,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METROWEST | $50,000 |
| The Dimock Center | $50,000 |
| SPOONFULS | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY BOAT BUILDING | $50,000 |
| Pine Street Inn | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| MASSCHALLENGE | $50,000 |
| VISIONS INC | $50,000 |
| GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $796k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $780k · revenue +337%
COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC5× · 2020–2025 · $404k · revenue +72%- GBGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC4× · 2020–2025 · $335k · revenue +1%
Funded once
TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATEDone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -29%- YWYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INCone grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue -85%
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
Education and Research
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Health Resources in Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 66 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds CODESQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MASSCHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds LEAP for Education Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CURRY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Amelia Peabody Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · State Street Foundation Inc · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Lynch Foundation · William E Schrafft and Bertha E Schrafft Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Blanchard Arthur F Tr Uagree funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hopewell Inc — 83% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Asian American Civic Association Inc — 19% of income from government
- Sociedad Latina Inc — 15% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Tech Goes Home Incorporated — 10% of income from government
- Leap for Education Inc — 9% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Florida Institute of Technology Inc — 5% of income from government
- Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology — 5% of income from government
- Masschallenge Inc — 3% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Springfield College — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Endicott College — 1% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 1% of income from government
- Assumption University — 0% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
- Curry College — 0% of income from government
- The Possible Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Nichols College — 0% of income from government
- Saint Michael's College — 0% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Stonehill College Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.