Skip to content

· Public charity

Blake Bortles Foundation Inc

Support individuals with intellectual and developmental challenges in their pursuit of full,independent lives.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$90kRecreation & Sports$65kEmployment$60kCommunity Improvement$54kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEducation$20kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSPIRE CENTRAL FLORIDA$9,000
OVIEDO POLICE FOUNDATION$5,000
OVIEDO YOUTH FOOTBALL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANGELWOOD INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$269k · 6 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$269k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+28%

Still filing today

83%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentRecreation & SportsEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Arc Jacksonville Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +23%
  • KA
    KATHLEEN ANDERSON COMPREHENSIVE WORK CENTER INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +80%
  • PA
    Police Athletic League of Jacksonville Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $35k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • OP
    OVEIDO PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FALL BALL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AI
    ANGELWOOD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Empowerment of Florida Inc

Assist disabled individuals in finding and keeping employment.

Human Services
2
Southwest Florida Job Squad Inc

Provide employment services to individuals with disabilities/barriers

—
3
The Arc of the Glades

In Partnership for Full Equality for People with Developmental Disabilities To PARTNER with people living with developmental disabilities for equal participation and inclusion.

Human Services
4
Onslow Commission for Persons With Disabilities

The mission of the Onslow Commission for Persons with Disabilities is to improve and enhance the quality of life for citizens with disabilities who live in Jacksonville and Onslow County area.

—
5
Palatka Police Athletic League Inc

building relationships between kids, cops, and communities through positive engagement, often with a focus on crime prevention and providing alternatives to negative influences

Youth Development
6
Innovate Orlando Inc
Education
7
Jacksonville Area Center for Independent Living

Enable individuals with disabilities to gain effective control and direction of their own lives in home, workplace and community. The goal is to stimulate and promote a growing sense of personal dignity.

Arts & Culture
8
All Florida Arts & Athletics Preparatory Academy Incorporated

provide mental health related services and activities to youth and their families. serving undeserved neighborhoods.

Human Services
9
Oic of South Florida Inc

The mission of oic of south florida is to be a leader in providing quality self-help skills and employment opportunities for disadvantaged and underemployed residents of south florida; thus, assisting them to become self-sufficient and…

Employment
10
The Arc of the St Johns Inc

Provide the opportunity for hope, growth, and change to people with I/DD in our community.

Human Services
11
Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc
—
12
Center for Independent Living of North Florida Inc

Ability 1st, The Center for Independent Living of North Florida, is a community-based organization that provides services to people with varying disabilities. Our mission is to empower people with disabilities to live independently and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc Jacksonville Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oviedo Police Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Arc Jacksonville Inc: $99,900 · OtherThe Arc Jacksonville IncPolice Athletic League of Jacksonville Inc: $35,000 · OtherPolice Athletic League of Jacksonville IncINSPIRE CENTRAL FLORIDA: $19,000 · OtherINSPIRE CENTRAL FLORIDAOVEIDO PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FALL BALL: $10,000 · OtherOVIEDO PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS: $10,000 · OtherOVEIDO PROF FIRE FIGHTERS: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA GOLF TOURNAMENT: $9,000 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherKATHLEEN ANDERSON COMPREHENSIVE WORK CENTER INC: $60,000 · EmploymentKATHLEEN ANDERSON C…Jacksonville Frat Order of Police Foundation: $35,000 · Community ImprovementJacksonvill…OVIEDO POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterANGELWOOD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBASCA INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$203,400Employment$60,000Community Improvement$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Arc Jacksonville Inc: $99,900 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetKATHLEEN ANDERSON COMPREHENSIVE WORK CENTER INC: $60,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetJacksonville Frat Order of Police Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetOVIEDO POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetANGELWOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBASCA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Arc Jacksonville Inc ↗
  • Who funds KATHLEEN ANDERSON COMPREHENSIVE WORK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Police Athletic League of Jacksonville Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jacksonville Frat Order of Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OVIEDO POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
  • Who funds BASCA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blake Bortles Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blake Bortles Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Basca Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blake Bortles’ filings →

More from the funding graph