· Public charity
Black Impact Community Fund Inc
To address racial wealth and technological inequality by providing underserved communities and marginalized groups with educational programs, career support and other resources like financial counseling that will help them build the skills to decrease multigenerational poverty and build generational wealth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $388,688 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $411,189 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $22,501 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
- $250k+1 grant · $334k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOLA FOUNDATION | $333,688 |
| HOLLYROD FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SHE READY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $10,000 |
| THINKWATTS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To change the conditions which lead to los angeles civil unrest through job creation, research and real property development programs.
Promote social welfare thru political policy
Mental health services advocacy
Black skeptics los angeles (bsla) is a south los angeles-based nonprofit dedicated to promoting and supporting black and bipoc secular communities and individuals, with an emphasis on providing educational programming, arts education,…
The mission of the black and brown womyn power coalition, inc. is to build the capacitites of black and brown advocates and their communities to end violence against womyn, queer, and trans folx and young people.
California latinas for reproductive justice (clrj) is a statewide organization committed to honoring the experiences of latinas to uphold our dignity, our bodies, sexuality, and families. we build latinas' power and cultivate leadership…
We support the creation of systems of care for the wellbeing and liberation for those working towards more justice in los angeles. we advance racial and social justice by providing grants, training, peer learning, and healing spaces that…
Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.
To rebuild cultural foundations of underinvested neighborhoods and incite community revitalization through the arts.
The sherman phoenix foundation builds inclusive and just economies for communities of color through strategies that support entrepreneurship, wellness, workplace inclusion, and economic empowerment.
To create safe and inclusive spaces for self-expression and celebration, and honor the unique heritage and diverse cultures of greater los angeles' lgbtq+ community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridge Builders Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Access Justice Brooklyn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · United Way Inc · Weingart Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Black Impact Community Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.