Loading…
· Public charity
BLACK IMPACT COMMUNITY FUND INC
To address racial wealth and tech gaps with education, career support, and financial resources.
$411k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$334k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Youth Development$344kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$13kCommunity Improvement$10kHuman Services$10k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
—
2024
literacysupplies studentsyouth
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
- $250k+1 grant · $334k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$340k
Total assets
Largest grants
- SOLA FOUNDATION$333,688
- HOLLYROD FOUNDATION$25,000
- THINKWATTS FOUNDATION$10,000
- COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$10,000
- SHE READY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Community Build Inc
To provide family, youth, community outreach and economic development services.
—
2
Pf Bresee Foundation
Bresee battles poverty by empowering youth and families in l.a. with the skills, resources and relationships necessary to thrive.
—
3
Black & Brown Womyn Power Coalition Inc
To build black and brown advocacy to end violence against vulnerable people.
Crime & Legal
4
Brooklyn Community Foundation
Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.
Philanthropy
5
Southwest Boston Community Development
The southwest boston community development corporation is led by principles of racial equity and inclusion, to alleviate social and economic disparities that impact people's quality of life and future opportunities. it shall be led by and…
Community Improvement
6
Drew Child Development Corporation
Preparing the children of watts-willowbrook, compton, and south los angeles to succeed and thereby strengthen our community's future
Human Services
7
The Bronx Defenders
The bronx defenders provides legal representation and other related services to more than 20,000 low-income people in the bronx, every year, free of charge.
Crime & Legal
8
Policybridge Inc
See schedule opolicybridge is a research & advocacy think & action tank prompting public policy change for african-americans & other underserved groups.
Civil Rights
9
Public Counsel
Public counsel is a nonprofit public interest law firm dedicated to (see sch o for continuation)advancing civil rights and racial and economic justice, as well as to amplifying the power of our clients through comprehensive legal advocacy.
Crime & Legal
10
Brooklyn Community Pride Center Inc
Bcpc provides services and support to brooklyn's lgbtq+ community through original programming and partnerships with other organizations.
Civil Rights
11
Rebound Inc
To create positive impact in housing and economic development, while helping families to have access to affordable, quality housing within our historic urban neighborhoods.
—
12
Better Business Bureau of Los Angeles
To be the leader in advancing marketplace trust. setting standards for trust, encouraging & supporting best practices by educating consumers and businesses, celebrating marketplace role models, addressing substandard marketplace behavior.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Destination Crenshaw and the most unlike its peers is Hollyrod Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Youth Development$343,688Recreation & Sports$25,000Arts & Culture$12,500Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way IncCA13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way Inc · Weingart Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · California Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation BLACK IMPACT COMMUNITY FUND INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOLA I CAN FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 824698211 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOLA I CAN FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Black Impact Community Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Black Impact Community Fund Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines