Skip to content

· Private foundation

Black Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$282kEducation$202kPublic Benefit$90kHuman Services$75kHousing & Shelter$55kYouth Development$35kEnvironment$30kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY CHURCH$58,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$48,000
ALPINE COMMUNITY CHURCH$25,000
ODYSSEY HOUSE - UTAH$20,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC$20,000
MERCURY ONE$15,000
YOUTH IMPACT INC$10,000
SINFONIA$6,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$4,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TROOP 20$4,000
CORNER CANYON CHURCH$3,000
THE ROCK CHURCH$3,000
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
FIVE 12 FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RAISE THE FUTURE: $10k → 12%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
UT
CO
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$625k · 9 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$625k
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+30%

Still filing today

56%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +3%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +5%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • LL
    LIVING LANDS & WATERSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +62%
  • SA
    ST ANNE'S CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
2
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
3
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
4
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
5
Utah Geological Foundation
—
6
Utah Swat Inc
—
7
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
8
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
9
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
10
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
11
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
12
Utahns Against Hunger

Our mission is to increase access to food across utah through advocacy, outreach, and education. utahns against hunger is utahs only state-wide anti-hunger non-profit organization working on public policy and advocacy for federal nutrition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Odyssey House Inc - Utah; the most unlike its peers is Five 12 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY CHURCH: $196,150 · OtherBOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY CHURCHUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $192,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYALPINE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherALPINE COMMUNITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $31,622 · OtherTHE NAZARENE FUND: $30,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANK: $25,000 · Other+19 more: $162,000 · Other+19 moreJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $90,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WA…LIVING LANDS & WATERS: $30,000 · EnvironmentRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesRAISE THE FUTURE: $10,000 · Human ServicesRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $22,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthMercury One Inc: $15,000 · InternationalFIVE 12 FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$681,772Public Benefit$90,000Environment$30,000Human Services$25,000Health$23,000International$15,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAZARENE FUND: $30,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLIVING LANDS & WATERS: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMercury One Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Alliance on Mental Illness Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NAZARENE FUND ↗
  • Who funds LIVING LANDS & WATERS ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
  • Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds National Alliance on Mental Illness Utah ↗
  • Who funds FIVE 12 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Petersen Bruce & Cecilia Fdn-Main · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · The Community Foundation of Utah · Texas Instruments Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Black Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Black Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Black Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Black Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Black Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph