Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bjorkman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$247kReligion$131kFood & Nutrition$55kHousing & Shelter$46kInternational$12kHealth$11kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$705k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT HARBOR BIBLE CAMP$30,000
NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY$10,000
NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY$10,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$9,000
NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY$7,500
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY OUTREACH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
COVENANT POINT BIBLE CAMP$1,500
COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES$1,000
DUPAGE HABITAT HUMANITY$1,000
HARBOR POINT MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$511k · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$511k
$3k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $238k · revenue +12%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +17%
  • CC
    Cornerstone Community Outreach
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago

Cornerstone Counseling empowers people to reach their spiritual, relational, and emotional potential through exceptional counseling and personal development services.

—
2
Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches

Gmcc is an interfaith, multicultural nonprofit organization with a mission "uniting people of faith, serving people in need." we have a 117 year old history collaborating with communites to addressinequities and disparities throughout…

Religion
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Chicago Christian Counseling Center

To promote healing and wholeness through professional counseling, consultation and education from a Christian perspective

Health
5
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
9
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
10
Churches United in Ministry

Churches united in ministry (chum) is people of faith working together to provide basic necessities, foster stable lives and organize for a just and compassionate community.

—
11
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
12
Covenant House Chicago
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Courtside Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $237,550 · EducationNORTH PARK UNIVERSITYCOVENANT HARBOR BIBLE CAMP: $90,500 · OtherCOVENANT HARBOR BIBLE CAMPDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,000 · OtherDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITYPaul Carlson Medical Program Inc: $11,500 · OtherPaul Carlson Medical Program IncCOVENANT POINT BIBLE CAMP: $10,000 · OtherCOVENANT POINT BIBLE CAMPHARBOR POINT MINISTRIES: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherCOVENANT WOMEN'S MINISTRIES: $8,000 · OtherLAKE CO HABITAT HUMANITY: $7,750 · Other+3 more: $9,000 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $49,400 · Food & NutritionGREATER CH…Cornerstone Community Outreach: $18,000 · Community ImprovementLUMUNOS INC: $8,000 · ReligionCOURTSIDE MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionCovenant Community Care Inc: $10,500 · HealthCOVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $9,000 · Human ServicesFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,500 · International
Education$237,550Other$170,750Food & Nutrition$49,400Community Improvement$18,000Religion$13,000Health$10,500Human Services$9,000International$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $237,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $49,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone Community Outreach: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPaul Carlson Medical Program Inc: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCovenant Community Care Inc: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES: $9,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetLUMUNOS INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOURTSIDE MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone Community Outreach ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds Paul Carlson Medical Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds Covenant Community Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LUMUNOS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds COURTSIDE MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bjorkman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bjorkman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bjorkman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph