Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Biz Bash Inc

Biz bash was formed to promote giving to worthy causes in arizona and colorado, primarily those exempt organizations providing services to at-risk youth and their families in the metro phoenix and denver communities.

$234k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Health$620kYouth Development$460kHuman Services$235kEducation$101k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$117,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A Precious Child Inc$117,000
Kids First Health Care$117,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%A Precious Child Inc: $117k → 5%A Precious Child Inc: $15k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 6 repeat orgs$253k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$253k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+144%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $292k · revenue +0%
  • KF
    KIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $274k · revenue +86%
  • BA
    BE A LEADER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $101k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • AH
    ARAPAHOE HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $175k
  • AN
    A NEW LEAFgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $78k · revenue +144%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Leaf Behavioral Health

New leaf behavioral health believes quality mental health care should be accessible to all in need in our community. we strive to make this vision a reality by providing innovative access to cutting edge outpatient clinical services.

Health
2
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

3
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
4
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
5
Pathways Kitchen

Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward

Crime & Legal
6
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
7
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
8
Family Pathways

Family pathways is a comprehensive program designed to meet the placement, therapeutic, and psychosocial support needs of children and families in transition. family pathways' philosophy is to strengthen families through relationships.

Human Services
9
Partners in Child Development Inc

To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…

Human Services
10
Path

Path makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies.

International
11
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
12
Guided Pathways Support for Youth and Families

We empower and support families and youth struggling with behavioral, emotional or substance abuse challenges in navigating resources to achieve wellness and resilience.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Colorado Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE — $273,500 · HealthKIDS FIRST HEALTH CAREFEEDING MATTERS INC — $171,500 · HealthFEEDING MATTERS INCA NEW LEAF — $78,000 · HealthA NEW LEAFBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC — $291,500 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER…ARAPAHOE HOUSE INC — $175,000 · OtherARAPAHOE HOUSE…New Pathways For Youth — $168,000 · Crime & LegalNew Pathways …A PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $157,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS C…BE A LEADER FOUNDATION — $100,500 · Public Benefit
Health$523,000Youth Development$291,500Other$175,000Crime & Legal$168,000Human Services$157,000Public Benefit$100,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC — $291,500 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetKIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE — $273,500 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetARAPAHOE HOUSE INC — $175,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFEEDING MATTERS INC — $171,500 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $157,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBE A LEADER FOUNDATION — $100,500 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetA NEW LEAF — $78,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Biz Bash Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph