Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bixel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$29kYouth Development$15kInternational$8kRecreation & Sports$4kHuman Services$4kAnimals$2kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$540
Median grant
4
States reached
$187k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG LIFE$5,000
LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL$1,577
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,500
FREEDOM 58$1,073
EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION$540
CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION$500
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC$500
INTERCAMBIO UNITING COMMUNITIES$500
BOULDER BRIDGE HOUSE$313
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$260
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $161 → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $92 → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $49 → 12%LOVE FOR LILY: $416 → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $540 → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $525 → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $312 → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $520 → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $204 → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $100 → 12%INTERCAMBIO UNITING COMMUNITIES: $500 → 12%INTERCAMBIO UNITING COMMUNITIES: $500 → 12%INTERCAMBIO UNITING COMMUNITIES: $364 → 12%INTERCAMBIO UNITING COMMUNITIES: $255 → 12%LOVE FOR LILY: $204 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$34k · 14 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$34k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+34%

Still filing today

86%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +62%
  • LJ
    LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    3× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH BOULDER
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
  • LD
    LOVES DOOR 4 ALL NATIONS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -13%
  • LD
    LOVES DOOR 4 ALL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of the Rockies

Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
6
Activate Work Inc

We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.

Human Services
7
Colorado Village Collaborative

Empowering community, enacting change. colorado village collaborative exists to bridge the gap between the streets and stable housing by creating and operating transformational shelter communities in partnership with people experiencing…

Housing & Shelter
8
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
9
Coloradans for Food Justice

Coloradans for food justice is building community power by making sure that every eater in colorado has a voice to make transformative change that represents a more just food system by mobilizing values-driven voters statewide.

10
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
11
Discovery Christian Church of Colorado

Make disciples of Jesus that make new disciples

Religion
12
Project Worthmore

To provide programs that foster community, self-sufficiency and increase quality of life among denver-area refugees. from our start offering makeshift english classes in living rooms, we now offer six comprehensive programs to thousands of…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Community Sailing of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH BOULDER — $27,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH BOULDERINTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC — $1,500 · Other+9 more — $4,449 · Other+9 moreYOUNG LIFE — $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLET…+1 more — $50 · Youth DevelopmentLOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL — $4,731 · InternationalLOVE JUSTICE…LOVES DOOR 4 ALL NATIONS INC — $3,000 · InternationalLOVES DOOR 4…EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $1,685 · Human ServicesINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES — $1,619 · Human ServicesLOVE FOR LILY — $620 · Human ServicesBridge House — $516 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $302 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION — $1,500 · AnimalsPROJECT ANIMALAID — $723 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $1,558 · Food & NutritionBOULDER FOOD RESCUE — $104 · Food & NutritionTHE A PARTNERS DBA THE ANTIOCH PARTNERS — $1,000 · Religion
Other$32,949Youth Development$18,550International$7,731Human Services$4,742Animals$2,223Food & Nutrition$1,662Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE — $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL — $4,731 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOVES DOOR 4 ALL NATIONS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $1,685 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES — $1,619 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $1,558 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE A PARTNERS DBA THE ANTIOCH PARTNERS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANIMALAID — $723 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE FOR LILY — $620 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBridge House — $516 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SAILING OF COLORADO — $309 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $302 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER FOOD RESCUE — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG WAVES INC — $104 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCal-Wood Education Center — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEF ANN FOUNDATION — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINVEST IN KIDS — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · AEC Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bixel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph