Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bishai Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$22kHuman Services$7kEducation$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kAnimals$4kFood & Nutrition$3kReligion$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,160
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,160
KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$1,160
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,160
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US$1,160
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,160
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,160
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,160
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$1,160
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,160
Individual grant recipient$1,160
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$1,160
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$1,160
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,160
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,160
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MI
NY
PA
CO
WV
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$41k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$41k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+46%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +31%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +46%
  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • MF
    MACOMB FOOD PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +52%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2020 · $850
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $850

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

3
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
4
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
5
American College of Lifestyle Medicine

Mission statement: advancing evidence-based lifestyle medicine to treat, reverse and prevent non-communicable, chronic disease. vision statement: a nation and world wherein lifestyle medicine is the foundation of health and all healthcare.…

Health
6
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
7
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
8
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
9
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
12
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

To advance and disseminate the science and practice of hepatology, and to promote liver health and quality patient care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY — $3,760 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS — $3,560 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $3,410 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $3,010 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $3,010 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $2,160 · OtherKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient — $2,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND — $2,160 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND+10 more — $4,100 · Other+10 moreARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,160 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUN…American Heart Association Inc — $2,160 · HealthAmerican Heart…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $850 · HealthAMERICAN CANCE…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $850 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $550 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DI…+1 more — $100 · HealthHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,660 · EducationHILLSDALE CO…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,160 · EducationSTEPHEN SILL…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,110 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 · Human ServicesHumane World for Animals Inc — $3,560 · AnimalsMACOMB FOOD PROGRAM — $2,550 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $550 · Food & NutritionIT IS WRITTEN INC — $1,600 · Philanthropy
Other$27,330Health$6,670Education$5,820Human Services$3,610Animals$3,560Food & Nutrition$3,100Philanthropy$1,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,660 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $3,560 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,110 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMACOMB FOOD PROGRAM — $2,550 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIT IS WRITTEN INC — $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOICE OF PROPHECY — $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bishai Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Adventist Development & Relief Agency International35% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph