Skip to content

· Private foundation

Birdsong Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$713kEnvironment$353kYouth Development$180kHuman Services$140kRecreation & Sports$13k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WILD CENTER$25,000
THE WILD CENTER$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$25,000
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$25,000
COLORADO UPLIFT$20,000
WILD SALMON CENTER$15,000
NORTH COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,000
PAUL SMITH'S COLLEGE$15,000
ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST$5,000
FRIENDS OF LORY STATE PARK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BERKSHIRE FARM CENTER AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH: $10k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CENTER AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Birdsong Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Birdsong Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-12%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $278k · revenue +42%
  • ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +4%
  • WS
    WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • The President and Trustees of Colby College
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
6
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
7
Linfield University

Linfield university advances a vision of learning, life, and community that promotes intellectual challenge and creativity, values both theoretical and practical knowledge, engages thoughtful dialogue in a climate of mutual respect and…

Education
8
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
9
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
10
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
11
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center; the most unlike its peers is Ymca of the Rockies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $220,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $205,000 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATIONCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $180,000 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIFT INC+2 more: $35,000 · EducationNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $277,500 · Arts & CultureNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM…YMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $125,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE…TOGETHER FOR YOUTH: $15,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FO…NORTH COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $52,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF LORY STATE PARK: $13,000 · OtherADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentWILD SALMON CENTER: $25,000 · Animals
Education$840,000Arts & Culture$277,500Human Services$140,000Other$65,500Environment$50,000Animals$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $277,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $220,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $205,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $180,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $125,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER FOR YOUTH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER FOR YOUTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Birdsong Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Birdsong Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Birdsong Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph