Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundation

Grants to promote jewish life and security.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Federation Of Greater Rochester Ny Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
17
5
18
3
19
2
20
3
21
3
22
1
23
2
24
2
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$424kInternational$403kHealth$155kEducation$86kReligion$62kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $62,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $135,800 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$897k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER$20,000
SCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL$12,000
ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL$10,000
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC$10,000
PEFISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10k → 14%MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JCC: $15k → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 32% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$465k · 3 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$465k
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+57%

Still filing today

67%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    6× · 2017–2024 · $378k · revenue +53%
  • SH
    SCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +81%
  • TW
    THE WILLIE AND CELIA TRUMP SYNAGOGUE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $37k

Funded once

  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +41%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +35%
  • MS
    MAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

6
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
7
University of Judaism Foundation
8
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
9
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

10
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
12
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of Greater Rochester Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER NY INC — $213,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF GREATER ROCHES…GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $210,900 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $378,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MED…MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA INC — $50,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI ME…SCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $50,845 · OtherSCHECK HIL…THE WILLIE AND CELIA TRUMP SYNAGOGUE INC — $36,550 · OtherTHE WILLIE…HILLEL SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · OtherHILLEL SCH…THE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF BROWARD COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherTHE HEBREW…MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL — $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC — $25,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$468,900International$378,000Health$150,000Other$112,395Human Services$30,000Religion$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $378,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER NY INC — $213,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $210,900 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $50,845 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF BROWARD COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Chester FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Chester Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Binik-Lewinger Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph