Skip to content
Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$180kCommunity Improvement$60kEmployment$25kPublic Benefit$25kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITT COUNTY COMMITTEE OF 100 INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10k → 16%THIRD STREET EDUCATION CENTER: $25k → 20%LIVES OF PURPOSE INC: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
2
Power of the Dream Inc

Our Mission is to Create Jobs and Advocate for Adults with Autism IDD in the North Carolina Triangle area.

Employment
3
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
4
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
5
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
6
Spotlight Good News Ministry

Spotlight Good News exists to encourage people to live faithfully before God in daily life, in service to their community, church and families, and by getting involved to make a positive difference in the lives of other people.

Human Services
7
Lighthouse Ministries of Raleigh Inc

Line 1, Description of organization mission: Our mission is to help fulfill the great commission of making disciples through biblical counseling, coaching, small groups, speaking and writing. To provide a safe environment for adults and…

Religion
8
The Enrichment Center an Affiliated Chapter of the Arc

To provide services that assist individuals with developmental disabilities in becoming as independent and self-sufficient as possible.

Philanthropy
9
East Carolina Study Center Inc

To provide a space where students, faculty, and campus ministries can come to study, fellowship, encourage, and strengthen each other in their Christian faith while attending East Carolina University and Pitt Community College.

Religion
10
Kindness Cville

To provide meaningful employment for people with cognitive disabilities.

Employment
11
Designed for Joy

Designed For Joy provides women in crisis with stability through immediate employment and support, removing the stigma of vulnerability.

Religion
12
Carolina Community Impact Inc

Carolina community impact, inc. (cci) is a non-profit organization that provides access to credit and asset-building techniques for individuals and small businesses. our mission is to promote economic and community development by providing…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Nc East Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lives of Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hope of Glory Ministries Inc: $150,000 · ReligionHope of Glory Ministries IncThird Street Education Center Inc: $25,000 · ReligionThird Street Education Center Inc+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionPitt County Committee of 100 Inc: $60,000 · Community ImprovementPitt County Committ…HEART FOR ENC: $25,000 · Public BenefitACES FOR AUTISM: $25,000 · HealthLives of Purpose Inc: $25,000 · EmploymentTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NC EAST INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 · Youth Development
Religion$180,000Community Improvement$60,000Public Benefit$25,000Health$25,000Employment$25,000Philanthropy$25,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHope of Glory Ministries Inc: $150,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetPitt County Committee of 100 Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThird Street Education Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHEART FOR ENC: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetACES FOR AUTISM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLives of Purpose Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NC EAST INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eddie and Jo Allison …Blackwelder Family Fo…University Health Sys…Tr Uw Vivian S West -…Mildred Sheffield Wel…James J & Mamie Richa…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation IncNC19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · Blackwelder Family Foundation · University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Vivian S West - West Memorial Fund · Mildred Sheffield Wells Char Trust · James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bill and Faye Stallings Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bill and Faye Stallings Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home