Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bill and del Duffy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$14kHuman Services$13kHealth$12kInternational$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$5kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
12
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE WALKS$2,500
CPS$2,500
FOSTERING HOPE$2,500
LASALLE UNIVERSITY$1,500
PHILABUNDANCE$1,500
FORE HADLEY FOUNDATION$1,000
DOMENICA FOUNDATION$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$500
GENTRY FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM$500
HAITI HEALTH & REHAB$500
BASILICA OF ST ANNE$500
SOLES4SOULS INC$500
SHERYL ZDZIARSKI FUND$500
PENNSBURY KIDS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PENNSBURY KIDS: $500 → 6%FOSTERING HOPE: $3k → 7%SOLES4SOULS INC: $750 → 14%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $500 → 12%FOSTERING HOPE: $2k → 7%SOLES4SOULS INC: $500 → 14%SOLES4SOULS INC: $500 → 14%SOLES4SOULS INC: $500 → 14%SOLES4SOULS INC: $500 → 14%SOLES4SOULS INC: $500 → 14%PHILLY HOUSE: $250 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 21 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$189k
$4k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    HOPE WALKS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +121%
  • FH
    FORE HADLEY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +90%
  • DF
    DOMENICA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +220%

Funded once

  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • HS
    HOLY SAVIOUR CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Sharing Excess

Sharing excess (se) is a philadelphia-based nonprofit that uses surplus food as a solution to scarcity. while over 40 million people in the us face food insecurity, nearly 40% of the nation's food supply is going to waste. our mission is…

Food & Nutrition
7
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
8
Hope Ministries of Baton Rouge

Prevent homelessness. promote self-sufficiency and dignity.

Housing & Shelter
9
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
11
Project Bread-the Walk for Hunger Inc

Project bread integrates expertise earned through directly serving individuals, research, advocacy, and community engagement for a comprehensive approach that achieves large scale, sustainable impact to prevent hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cathedral Soup Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Domenica Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $124,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+22 more: $25,050 · Other+22 moreHOPE WALKS INC: $7,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $500 · InternationalFORE HADLEY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyDOMENICA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFOSTERING HOPE: $4,500 · Human ServicesSOLES4SOULS INC: $3,250 · Human ServicesPENNSBURY KIDS: $500 · Human ServicesTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationPhilabundance: $5,500 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $3,500 · HealthPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $1,750 · Recreation & Sports
Other$149,400International$11,000Philanthropy$11,000Human Services$9,000Education$7,000Food & Nutrition$5,500Health$3,500Recreation & Sports$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE WALKS INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORE HADLEY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPhilabundance: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOMENICA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOLES4SOULS INC: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHope Center Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSBURY KIDS: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE WALKS INC ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FORE HADLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds DOMENICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds SOLES4SOULS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNSBURY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bill and del Duffy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bill and del Duffy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bill and del Duffy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph