· Private foundation
Bieze Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $81k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Surviving Beast Cancer | $51,524 |
| PEO Foundation | $40,191 |
| Breast Friends | $24,367 |
| Operation Nightwatch | $16,196 |
| Loyal High School | $8,000 |
| National Christian Foundation | $6,155 |
| Casting for Recovery | $5,115 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BREAST FRIENDS4× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +571%
University of Illinois Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +127%- PFPEO Foundation2× · 2021–2025 · $41k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- LBLobular Breast Cancer Allianceone grant, 2019 · $5k
- OFOHSU Foundationone grant, 2021 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.
Breast cancer action's mission is to achieve health justice for all women at risk of or living with breast cancer.
To engage, educate and collaborate worldwide to bring about breakthroughs that will save lives from the toughest breast cancer: inflammatory breast cancer.
Provide immediate direct financial and emotional support to patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.
The mission of bcrc is to empower those affected by breast cancer with personalized support and compassion. bcrc is organized at the grass roots level by breast cancer survivors for the primary purpose of providing information and…
The Breast Cancer Charities of America (BCCA) exists to eliminate breast cancer as a life-threatening illness. We bring together organizations representing all health and social service disciplines in the commitment to establish new and…
To provide environments for women breast cancer survivors to heal emotionally.
To help find a cure for breast cancer by funding promising breast cancer research in alabama and to raise community awareness and funding for that research.
To improve the quality of life for individuals impacted by breast cancer by providing and advocating for specialized, evidence-based rehabilitation while minimizing socioeconomic, racial, cultural, and geographic barriers to care.
Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.
Bright pink's mission is to accelerate, deepen, and expand the impact of life-saving breast and ovarian health interventions.
To provide quick and compassionate emergency financial assistance to low-income people battling breast cancer in order to cover basic human needs, lessen financial burdens and improve quality of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Beyond Breast Cancer and the most unlike its peers is Operation Nightwatch - Portland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BREAST FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds SURVIVINGBREASTCANCERORG ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds PEO Foundation ↗
- Who funds Operation Nightwatch - Portland ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds FIGHTING PRETTY INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds DAVID HELLER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Expansion International Inc ↗
- Who funds CANNON BEACH LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds LArche Portland ↗
- Who funds CLATSOP CASA PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S BOOK BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bieze Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LArche Portland — 59% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.