Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bic Educational Foundation Inc

TO PROVIDE CHARITABLE SUPPORT TO STUDENTS PURSURING CAREERS IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY BY PROVIDING SCHOLARSHIPS TO ELIGIBLE STUDENTS.

$643k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$203k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$1.1MFood & Nutrition$736kHuman Services$77kEmployment$10k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $542k
$36,130
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$202,941
U EMPOWER OF MARYLAND$100,000
HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$68,781
FRIENDS OF GREAT KIDS FARM$65,000
MERGENTHALER VO-TECH HIGH SCHOOL$55,175
MARYLAND FOOD BANK$50,000
FOREST PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL$36,130
EDMONDSON WESTSIDE HIGH SCHOOL$16,649
TASTEWISE KIDS INC$15,000
THE CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$10,000
CARVER CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY$9,790
FRANCISCAN CENTER$7,745
VISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION & TRAINING FOUNDATION$5,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $69k → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Bic Educational Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bic Educational Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 16 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-25%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $393k · revenue +138% · 51% of their budget
  • UO
    UEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $235k · revenue +23%
  • TW
    TASTE WISE KIDS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $58k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • RA
    RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $757
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
2
Real Food for Kids

Real Food for Kids' mission is to change eating behaviors and improve health outcomes for children and families in the Greater Washington Region through sustainable access to real whole foods, impactful nutrition education, and local…

Youth Development
3
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Farm to School Frederick

To increase access to locally grown, highly nutritious food for all frederick, maryland residents. we aim to cultivate new markets for local farmers while enhancing awareness and understanding of the importance of food, nutrition, and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Bit Community Center Inc

The bit's (formerly known as italian cultural center) mission is to support an equitable prosperous baltimore building community health and wealth for citizens of the world who call baltimore home. always inspired by our italian culture,…

Arts & Culture
8
An End to Ignorance Inc

An End to Ignorance, Inc. feeds vulnerable people across Baltimore City, by rescuing good food that would ordinarily be thrown away, and then supplementing it with fresh meat and non-perishable goods. This work brings our most vulnerable…

—
9
Thought for Food Foundation
—
10
Black Girls Cook

Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.

Food & Nutrition
11
The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. the james…

—
12
Baltimore Food Hub Inc

To operate a campus housing site that creates a synergistic group of food-related businesses, services, and programs for a social work enterprise training facility.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uempower of Maryland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Culinary Institute of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $392,696 · OtherMORGAN STATE UNIVERSITYHOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $195,790 · OtherHOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGEMERGENTHALER VO-TECH HIGH SCHOOL: $141,049 · OtherMERGENTHALER VO-TECH HIGH SCHOOLSTRATFORD UNIVERSITY: $113,000 · OtherSTRATFORD UNIVERSITYFOREST PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: $85,992 · OtherFOREST PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $72,582 · OtherANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGETHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $73,968 · Other+5 moreFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN: $393,424 · EducationFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY…CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $37,500 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AME…+1 more: $13,100 · EducationUEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC: $235,000 · PhilanthropyUEMPOWER OF M…FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $77,146 · Human ServicesTASTE WISE KIDS INC: $58,000 · Youth DevelopmentVISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,125,077Education$444,024Philanthropy$235,000Human Services$77,146Youth Development$58,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN: $393,424 over 4y, 51% of budgetUEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC: $235,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $77,146 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTASTE WISE KIDS INC: $58,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $13,100 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetVISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN ↗
  • Who funds UEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TASTE WISE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation IncMD13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bic Educational Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bic Educational Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bic Educational Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bic Educational Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bic Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph