Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bic Educational Foundation Inc

TO PROVIDE CHARITABLE SUPPORT TO STUDENTS PURSURING CAREERS IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY BY PROVIDING SCHOLARSHIPS TO ELIGIBLE STUDENTS.

$643k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$203k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$1.1MFood & Nutrition$736kHuman Services$77kEmployment$10k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $542k
$36,130
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$202,941
U EMPOWER OF MARYLAND$100,000
HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$68,781
FRIENDS OF GREAT KIDS FARM$65,000
MERGENTHALER VO-TECH HIGH SCHOOL$55,175
MARYLAND FOOD BANK$50,000
FOREST PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL$36,130
EDMONDSON WESTSIDE HIGH SCHOOL$16,649
TASTEWISE KIDS INC$15,000
THE CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$10,000
CARVER CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY$9,790
FRANCISCAN CENTER$7,745
VISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION & TRAINING FOUNDATION$5,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $69k → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of Bic Educational Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Bic Educational Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 16 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-25%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $393k · revenue +138% · 51% of their budget
  • UO
    UEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $235k · revenue +23%
  • TW
    TASTE WISE KIDS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $58k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • RA
    RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $757

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
2
Real Food for Kids

Real Food for Kids' mission is to change eating behaviors and improve health outcomes for children and families in the Greater Washington Region through sustainable access to real whole foods, impactful nutrition education, and local…

Youth Development
3
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Farm to School Frederick

To increase access to locally grown, highly nutritious food for all frederick, maryland residents. we aim to cultivate new markets for local farmers while enhancing awareness and understanding of the importance of food, nutrition, and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Bit Community Center Inc

The bit's (formerly known as italian cultural center) mission is to support an equitable prosperous baltimore building community health and wealth for citizens of the world who call baltimore home. always inspired by our italian culture,…

Arts & Culture
8
An End to Ignorance Inc

An End to Ignorance, Inc. feeds vulnerable people across Baltimore City, by rescuing good food that would ordinarily be thrown away, and then supplementing it with fresh meat and non-perishable goods. This work brings our most vulnerable…

9
Thought for Food Foundation
10
Black Girls Cook

Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.

Food & Nutrition
11
The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. the james…

12
Baltimore Food Hub Inc

To operate a campus housing site that creates a synergistic group of food-related businesses, services, and programs for a social work enterprise training facility.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uempower of Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Culinary Institute of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $392,696 · OtherMORGAN STATE UNIVERSITYHOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $195,790 · OtherHOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGEMERGENTHALER VO-TECH HIGH SCHOOL — $141,049 · OtherMERGENTHALER VO-TECH HIGH SCHOOLSTRATFORD UNIVERSITY — $113,000 · OtherSTRATFORD UNIVERSITYFOREST PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL — $85,992 · OtherFOREST PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $72,582 · OtherANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGETHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 · Other+5 more — $73,968 · Other+5 moreFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN — $393,424 · EducationFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY…CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $37,500 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AME…+1 more — $13,100 · EducationUEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC — $235,000 · PhilanthropyUEMPOWER OF M…FRANCISCAN CENTER INC — $77,146 · Human ServicesTASTE WISE KIDS INC — $58,000 · Youth DevelopmentVISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,125,077Education$444,024Philanthropy$235,000Human Services$77,146Youth Development$58,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN — $393,424 over 4y, 51% of budgetUEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC — $235,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC — $77,146 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTASTE WISE KIDS INC — $58,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $13,100 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetVISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 20% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN
  • Who funds UEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds TASTE WISE KIDS INC
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
  • Who funds RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds VISIT BALTIMORE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation IncMD13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bic Educational Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bic Educational Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bic Educational Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph