Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bhandara Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$71kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kPhilanthropy$17kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$3kAnimals$2kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$648k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOROASTRIAN ASSOC OF HOUSTON-ENDOWM$37,789
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Explore Their Stories INC$2,500
Islamic Society of Greater Houston$2,001
Etoile Academy Charter School$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Touch Base Center for DeafBlind$500
BakerRipley$500
Hearthstone Heatwaves$300
Culture of Health-Advancing Togethe$250
Individual grant recipient$250
Star of Hope$100
THE SHERWIN WILLIAM CO$97
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Touch Base Center for DeafBlind: $3k → 16%Touch Base Center for DeafBlind: $3k → 16%Touch Base Center for DeafBlind: $500 → 16%BakerRipley: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$142k · 11 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$142k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+38%

Still filing today

27%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZA
    ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON
    4× · 2021–2024 · $64k · revenue +214%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2025 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k

Funded once

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR DISASTER RELIEF INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -93%
  • NF
    Nufdi Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • TG
    THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
Humane Farm Animal Care

Every farmer and rancher participating in the Certified Humane program had to modify their operations to meet the Animal Care Standards and be certified. Schedule O

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Animal Alliance Asia

Our mission is to build and mobilize a community of local animal justice and vegan advocates across Asia to create waves of impactful actions for a better world for farmed animals.

Animals
6
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
7
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
Human Rights and Business Award Foundation
Civil Rights
10
Gdp Research Alliance

The GDP Research Alliance (GDPRA) is a newly organized D.C. non-profit corporation that was formed exclusively for research, development, and educational purposes.

Science & Tech
11
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
12
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is From Fauna Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON: $63,687 · OtherZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTONIndividual grant recipient: $40,133 · OtherIndividual grant recipientZOROASTRIAN ASSOC OF HOUSTON-ENDOWM: $37,789 · OtherZOROASTRIAN ASSOC OF HOUSTON-ENDOWMNufdi Fund: $17,008 · OtherNufdi FundIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GREATER HOUSTON: $9,501 · Other+9 more: $10,098 · OtherALLIANCE FOR DISASTER RELIEF INC: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterALLIANCE FOR…TOUCH BASE CENTER FOR THE DEAFBLIND: $5,500 · Human ServicesBakerRipley: $500 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionFROM FAUNA INC: $500 · Food & NutritionTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $1,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $1,668 · Housing & ShelterDaya Inc: $500 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF NAMAL INC: $101 · Education
Other$193,216Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Animals$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,668Community Improvement$500Education$101

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON: $63,687 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR DISASTER RELIEF INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTOUCH BASE CENTER FOR THE DEAFBLIND: $5,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $1,668 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFROM FAUNA INC: $500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDaya Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NAMAL INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR DISASTER RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH BASE CENTER FOR THE DEAFBLIND ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds FROM FAUNA INC ↗
  • Who funds BakerRipley ↗
  • Who funds Daya Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NAMAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bhandara Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bhandara Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bhandara Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bhandara Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bhandara’s filings →

    More from the funding graph