How much did BEYGOOD FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of BEYGOOD FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2023

businesseducationenterprisesstaffinggroupendeavorsyouth

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $24k
$10k–50k68 grants · $875k
$50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
$250k+1 grant · $250k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$40M

Total assets

Largest grants

PRIVATE SCHOOL AXIS$250,000
REGGIE STEPHENS FOUNDATION$200,000
NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$170,000
FRIENDS UNITED FOR HBCUS INC$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLINIC$100,000
COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER OF HOUSTON$100,000
ANGEL BY NATURE$100,000
BILL PICKETT INVITATIONAL RODEO FOUNDATION$100,000
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
HOLLYROD FOUNDATION$100,000
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$50,000
BEAVER BEAUTY ACADEMY$50,000
TRENZ BEAUTY ACADEMY$50,000
JANAS COSMETOLOGY ACADEMY$50,000
UNIVERSAL COLLEGE OF BEAUTY INC$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 89% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Black Owned Business Excellence

Help create a more equitable entrepreneurial ecosystem in Washington State.

Community Improvement

Black Farmers Market

Support Black Farmers via programs and services

Human Services

Black Excellence Inc

To solve this, we have partnered with foundations, corporations, and executives to create pathways for career acceleration

Community Improvement

Black American Community Outreach Inc

To support black community with resources and tools to promote and encourage economic growth

Human Services

Once Upon a Preemie

Once upon a preemie, inc. is a black women-led non-profit organization committed to pioneering solutions for neonatal equity to center black preemie family experiences.

Health

Building Audacity

Founded in 2019, Building Audacity is a nonprofit organization that creates STEM-focused pathways and provides supporting resources within the agriculture field otherwise not available to Black and other youth of color.

Youth Development

Higher Learning U Inc

Success of Young Adults

Human Services

Good Hood Foundation

Support and advance entrepreneurship and small business development and growth for Black and other underrepresented populations.

Education

Turning Tables

Turning tables began in 2019 in partnership with new orleans industry non-profit and youth career development organizations. our vision was to create a bar training program that reflected the city we serve.

Employment

Black Girls Rock Inc

Empowering teen girls of color through arts and educational enrichment programs

Human Services

100 Black Men of West Texas Inc

The primary exempt purpose of 100 Black Men of West Texas, Inc., is charitable. The mission of the 100 Black Men Of West Texas, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for all residents of Lubbock, Texas and West Texas with emphasis on…

—

Black Girls Cook Inc

Black Girls Cook has a mission to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent black girls through culinary arts and urban farming with an emphasis on Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Empowerment Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love This Horse Equine Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 25% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%2/167

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,398

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/27

Grantees still filing

17/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,308,926Civil Rights$568,691Education$550,000Crime & Legal$325,000Recreation & Sports$125,000Youth Development$120,000Arts & Culture$95,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BEYGOOD FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANGEL BY NATURE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue held over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 800269551 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ANGEL BY NATURE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Beygood Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Beygood Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BEYGOOD FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Beygood Foundation?

More from the funding graph

BEYGOOD FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Beygood Foundation?

More from the funding graph