Skip to content
Beverley Way Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Beverley Way Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$317k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of Beverley Way Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Global Impact, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Beverley Way Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $317k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’21
7
’22
5
’23
8
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$1.1MEducation$143kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kHuman Services$48kHealth$30kCivil Rights$25k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$104k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE$100,000
THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION$60,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$25,000
ISLAMIC RELIEF USA$25,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$25,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN - PAKISTAN$12,500
SAVE THE CHILDREN - USA$12,500
VHL EUROPA NECKER ISLAND FOUNDATION$10,150
MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $60k → 16%ONE FAMILY MEMPHIS: $10k → 17%HAMPTON ROADS REFUGEE RELIEF: $10k → 17%RAISEACHILD: $25k → 14%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Beverley Way Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 14%.

Beverley Way Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$686k · 8 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$686k
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2021–2023 · $294k · revenue +64%
  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $111k · revenue +14%
  • THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
    2× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF
    one grant, 2021 · $61k
  • PF
    Pillars Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +342%
  • RA
    Raise A Child Incorporated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
2
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
3
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
4
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
5
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
6
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
United Nations International School

Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…

Education
9
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
10
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
11
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
12
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citizens Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is One Family Memphis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $294,457 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFGlobal Impact: $250,000 · InternationalGlobal ImpactISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $110,533 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USAUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $100,000 · InternationalUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $70,600 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC+2 more: $37,500 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $38,005 · EducationMANHATTAN B…THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZE…Raise A Child Incorporated: $25,000 · Human ServicesRaise A Ch…ONE FAMILY MEMPHIS: $10,000 · Human ServicesONE FAMILY…Hampton Roads Refugee Relief Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesHampton Ro…ISLAMIC RELIEF: $61,055 · OtherISLAMIC R…UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND: $25,000 · OtherUNITED NA…SAVE THE CHILDREN - PAKISTAN: $12,500 · OtherSAVE THE …VHL EUROPA NECKER ISLAND FOUNDATION: $10,150 · OtherVHL EUROP…CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN'…+1 more: $2,500 · OtherGLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePillars Fund: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthZaytuna College Inc: $5,000 · Religion
International$913,090Education$138,005Human Services$125,000Other$121,205Arts & Culture$40,000Philanthropy$25,000Health$10,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $294,457 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $110,533 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $70,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $38,005 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPillars Fund: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRaise A Child Incorporated: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAMILY MEMPHIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZaytuna College Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beverley Way Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beverley Way Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beverley Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home