Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beulah M Field Memorial T U W D July 3 1986

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$35kHuman Services$29kFood & Nutrition$14kReligion$14kEducation$12kYouth Development$11kHealth$9kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$285k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGHLANDS MUSEUM$4,000
HILLCRESTBRUCE MISSION$3,000
ASHLAND ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC$2,500
PARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER$2,500
SAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KENTUCKY$2,000
HOPE'S PLACE INC$2,000
ASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN$2,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE$1,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TRISTATE$1,500
ASHLAND AREA YMCA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $3k → 18%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $3k → 18%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $3k → 18%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $3k → 18%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $2k → 18%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $2k → 18%HOPE'S PLACE INC: $2k → 18%RAMEY ESTEP HOMES: $2k → 18%RAMEY ESTEP HOMES: $2k → 18%RAMEY ESTEP HOMES: $2k → 18%RAMEY ESTEP HOMES: $2k → 18%RAMEY ESTEP HOMES: $2k → 18%RAMEY ESTEP HOMES: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$143k
$0

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HOPE'S PLACE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $17k · revenue +85%
  • KC
    KENTUCKY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue +460%
  • SO
    SHELTER OF HOPE INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +101%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Animal Alliance of East Kentucky Inc
    Animals
    2
    House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

    To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

    Health
    3
    Hope Ministries of Northern Kentucky Inc

    Hope ministries helps low income families in northern kentucky with emergency food assistance, clothing, household items, and used toys.

    Human Services
    4
    Hope House of Scott County

    Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families

    Human Services
    5
    Helping Hounds Find Homesinc

    Saving the lives of homeless and unwanted pets in harrison county kentucky and surrounding areas.

    Animals
    6
    Kentucky Saving Them Together Inc
    Animals
    7
    The Gentry House Inc

    The gentry house, inc. is an emergency transitional homeless shelter to help families with children in the region of murray and calloway county, ky. residents are given rent and utility assistance.

    —
    8
    Homesafe of Sumner Wilson and Robertson Counties

    Homesafe provides safe, temorary shelter, and support services for indivduals who have suffered or have been threatened with emotional or physical abuse.

    Human Services
    9
    New Choices Inc

    The mission of new choices, inc. is to provide shelby county, ohio with the immediate care needs for individuals of domestic violence.

    Human Services
    10
    Realtor Community Housing Foundation Inc

    None

    Housing & Shelter
    11
    Ashtabula Homeless Shelterinc

    Provide emergency shelter and meals, case management and assessment to homeless individuals and families from the ashtabula county and surrounding areas.

    Housing & Shelter
    12
    Family Promise of Greater Kingsport

    Case management, daycenter, guest support, rapid rehousing, homeless prevention and transportation for homeless families with children.

    Housing & Shelter
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safe Harbor of Northeast Ky Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/10
    Grantees still filing
    7/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    HIGHLANDS MUSEUM: $23,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS MUSEUMASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $14,250 · OtherASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INCHILLCREST BRUCE UNITED METHODIST MINISTRIES INC: $14,000 · OtherHILLCREST BRUCE UNITED METHODIST MINISTRIES INCPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC: $11,500 · OtherPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INCASHLAND AREA YMCA: $6,000 · OtherASHLAND AREA YMCASAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INC: $6,000 · OtherSAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INCBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc: $5,500 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State IncSAFE HARBOR: $5,000 · OtherSAFE HARBORBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TRISTATE: $5,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TRISTATEHOPE'S PLACE INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesHOPE'S PLACE INCRAMEY-ESTEP HOMES INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesRAMEY-ESTEP HOMES I…KENTUCKY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · EducationSHELTER OF HOPE INC: $8,500 · Housing & ShelterASHLAND ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $7,750 · AnimalsFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $5,500 · Philanthropy
    Other$90,250Human Services$25,000Education$11,500Housing & Shelter$8,500Animals$7,750Philanthropy$5,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE'S PLACE INC: $16,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $14,250 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKENTUCKY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSHELTER OF HOPE INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRAMEY-ESTEP HOMES INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $7,750 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc: $5,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HOPE'S PLACE INC ↗
    • Who funds ASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
    • Who funds PARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds KENTUCKY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds SHELTER OF HOPE INC ↗
    • Who funds RAMEY-ESTEP HOMES INC ↗
    • Who funds ASHLAND ANIMAL RESCUE FUND ↗
    • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INC ↗
    • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc ↗
    • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West VirginiaWV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · United Way of Northeast Kentucky · Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · Marathon Petroleum Foundation Inc · Lowman Family Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Beulah M Field Memorial T U W D July 3 1986 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beulah M Field Memorial T U W D July 3 1986. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Beulah M Field Memorial T U W D July 3 1986?

      Find your warmest path to Beulah M Field Memorial T U W D July 3 1986 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $25k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Beulah M Field Memorial T U W D July 3 1986’s filings →

      More from the funding graph