· Private foundation
Beulah Land Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BETHEL GROVE BIBLE CHURCH | $18,000 |
| HIGH STREET COMMUNITY CHURCH | $15,500 |
| DAVIS CHINESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $12,000 |
| U C SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WESTGATE COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH | $10,000 |
| WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CALIFORNIA | $5,400 |
| CHINA LOGOS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY | $5,000 |
| SHUKUGAWA BIBLE CHURCH | $4,200 |
| CHINESE FOR CHRIST CHURCH OF SAN JOSE | $4,000 |
| SHIH-LIN ZION CHURCH | $3,200 |
| THE NAVIGATORS | $3,000 |
| LIVING WATER FILM MINISTRY | $2,400 |
| CITYTEAM MINISTRIES | $1,800 |
| INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $1,250 |
| CHINESE FOR CHRIST BERKELEY CHURCH | $1,200 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.
54 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- USUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +55%
- CMCITYTEAM MINISTRIES8× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +34%
- PIPEOPLE INTERNATIONAL5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- DCDAVIS CHINEE CHRISTIAN CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $10k
- CFCHINESE FOR CHRIST CHURCH BERKELEYone grant, 2021 · $4k
- ISINTERNATIONAL STUDENT SINCone grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.
Our mission is to accomplish the Great Commission through the use of resources of Chinese churches worldwide in mission education, recruitment, training, missionary sending, and all other effective means in collaboration with the Global…
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
An evangelical interdenominational missionary society dedicated to reaching chinese for christ.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory
The organizations mission is enhancing the legal distribution of free bibles and equipping and discipling pastors and trainers to use the word of god effectively.
To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.
We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.
How this is measured
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds DEL ORO CAREGIVER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ITHACA COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CHRISTIAN RESTAURANT MINISTRIESINC ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds Alternatives Pregnancy Center ↗
- Who funds GLORY AND WONDERS WORLD MISSION ↗
- Who funds TOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Cheng's Foundation · Servant Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Beulah Land Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beulah Land Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beulah Land Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Beulah Land Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Beulah Land’s filings →