Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Betts Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$35kPhilanthropy$30kHealth$14kArts & Culture$5kEducation$4kRecreation & Sports$4kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$377k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mind and Spirit Counseling Center$10,000
Great Outdoor Foundation - ICON Watertrails$2,000
Scottish Rite Park$1,100
Community Foundation Greater Des Moines$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JOPPA: $400 → 10%JOPPA: $400 → 10%JOPPA: $400 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$86k · 10 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$86k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-1%

Still filing today

40%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESTMINSTER CHURCH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $31k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue -19%
  • MA
    MIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue -8%

Funded once

  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -1%
  • GO
    GREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +5%
  • DM
    DES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

2
Greater Des Moines Partnership

None

Community Improvement
3
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
4
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
5
Des Moines Public Library Foundation

Raise funds and advocate provide for the des moines public library system.

Philanthropy
6
Des Moines University Osteopathic Medical Center

To improve lives in our global community by educating diverse groups of highly competent and compassionate health professionals.

Education
7
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

8
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

9
Greater Des Moines Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote and develop the visitors and convention industry in the greater des moines area and to encourage the utilization of facilities for visitors and conventions.

10
Upper Des Moines Opportunity Inc

Upper des moines opportunity, inc. is dedicated to helping build stronger communities by addressing the effects of poverty on individuals and families.upper des moines opportunity, inc. will strengthen communities through: the promotion of…

Community Improvement
11
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
12
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/a Greater Des Moines Community Fdn and the most unlike its peers is I Have a Dream Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMINSTER CHURCH — $30,650 · OtherWESTMINSTER CHURCHUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA — $30,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWAMIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER — $10,500 · OtherMIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER+13 more — $16,650 · Other+13 moreDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationELLIPSIS INC — $2,600 · HealthGREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION — $1,500 · AnimalsDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS — $1,300 · Community ImprovementJOPPA — $1,200 · Human ServicesDES MOINES FILM SOCIETY — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$87,800Education$4,000Health$2,600Animals$1,500Community Improvement$1,300Human Services$1,200Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER — $10,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELLIPSIS INC — $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOPPA — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTISH RITE PARK INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES FILM SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA
  • Who funds MIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ELLIPSIS INC
  • Who funds GREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds JOPPA
  • Who funds SCOTTISH RITE PARK INC
  • Who funds DES MOINES FILM SOCIETY
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN
  • Who funds I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wt and Edna M Dahl TrustIA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wt and Edna M Dahl Trust · Mary K and Daniel M Kelly Family Foundation C/O Dan Kelly · The West Bancorporation Foundation Inc · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation · John Ruan Foundation Trust · R & R Realty Group Foundation · Meredith Corporation Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Betts Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph