Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beth's Furry Friends Foundation

BIANCA'S FURRY FRIENDS FOUNDATION IS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, A SIGNIFICANT PURPOSE OF WHICH IS TO AID, RESCUE AND CARE FOR ANIMALS.

$207k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$2.3MScience & Tech$25kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$562Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PETCO FOUNDATION$60,000
LONG ISLAND BULLDOG RESCUE$45,000
EVELYN ALEXANDER WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER$25,000
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA$20,000
ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER OF NEW YORK$10,000
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
DUTCHIE & RENEE SENIOR CAT RESCUE$9,500
ANIMAL FRIENDS OF BARBOUR COUNTY$5,000
KELLYS FOSTERS INC$5,000
SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
SAN DIEGO HOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY$5,000
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS$2,500
FRIENDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE DOGS RESCUE SOLDIERS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
KY
WV
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 30 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
26

Total granted

$2.4M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-5%

Still filing today

67%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsScience & TechPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $391k · revenue +1%
  • TA
    THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $62k · revenue +30%
  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $43k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • ER
    Eastwood Ranch Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -31%
  • VM
    VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER OF LONG ISLAND
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • PP
    PITTIE PARTY RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
3
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
4
Jl Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
5
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
6
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
7
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
8
Kitten Around Cat Rescue
Animals
9
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
10
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
11
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
12
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eastwood Ranch Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kellys Fosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $390,520 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INCLONG ISLAND BULLDOG RESCUE: $267,548 · AnimalsLONG ISLAND BULLDOG RESCUEEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $140,000 · AnimalsEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center IncTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $62,194 · AnimalsANIMAL FRIENDS OF BARBOUR COUNTY INC: $55,000 · AnimalsTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $42,500 · Animals+15 more: $226,116 · Animals+15 moreLONG ISLAND VETERINARY SPECIALISTS: $703,429 · OtherLONG ISLAND VETERINARY SPECIALISTSDUTCHIE & RENEE SENIOR CAT RESCUE: $103,520 · OtherDUTCHIE & RENEE SENIOR CAT RESCUEANIMAL CONTROL CENTER OF NEW YORK: $70,000 · OtherANIMAL CONTROL CENTER OF NEW YORKSAG HARBOR VETERINARY CLINIC: $55,494 · Other+27 more: $120,887 · Other+27 morePETCO LOVE: $190,000 · PhilanthropyLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $26,000 · Science & TechRESCUE DOGS RESCUE SOLDIERS CORP: $5,000 · Human Services
Animals$1,228,878Other$1,053,330Philanthropy$190,000Science & Tech$26,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $390,520 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLONG ISLAND BULLDOG RESCUE: $267,548 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetPETCO LOVE: $190,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $140,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $62,194 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS OF BARBOUR COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $42,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDOGS AND CATS FOREVER: $37,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPalm Beach Island Cats Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetAMARYLLIS FARM EQUINE RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetGREENPOINT CATS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $16,500 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetASLANS CATS INC: $16,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetHEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKELLYS FOSTERS INC: $14,500 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetBLACK JAGUAR WHITE TIGER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAN DIEGO COMPANION RABBIT SOCIETY INC DBA SAN DIEGO HOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEastwood Ranch Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRESCUE DOGS RESCUE SOLDIERS CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetORPHAN ANGELS CAT SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHumane Long Island: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetA SECOND CHANCE PUPPIES AND KITTENS RESCUE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIDGE CLINIC INC: $1,116 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND BULLDOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds PETCO LOVE ↗
  • Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS OF BARBOUR COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOGS AND CATS FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Palm Beach Island Cats Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMARYLLIS FARM EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPOINT CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds ASLANS CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds KELLYS FOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK JAGUAR WHITE TIGER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO COMPANION RABBIT SOCIETY INC DBA SAN DIEGO HOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Eastwood Ranch Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE DOGS RESCUE SOLDIERS CORP ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN ANGELS CAT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Humane Long Island ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leslie L Alexander Foundation IncFL17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Bruce G Geary Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · Best Friends Animal Society · Greater Good Charities · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beth's Furry Friends Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beth's Furry Friends Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dogs and Cats Forever: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Beth's Furry Friends Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Beth's Furry Friends Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beth's Furry Friends’ filings →

More from the funding graph