Skip to content

· Private foundation

Best in Giving Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$63kHousing & Shelter$45kHuman Services$20kAnimals$5kFood & Nutrition$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$649k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROHN'S AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$35,000
THE CARYING PLACE$20,000
YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA$10,000
TRANSITION LIFECARE$2,500
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER CHARLOTTE$2,500
SECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTION$2,000
A PLACE AT THE TABLE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Center for Volunteer Caregiving: $5k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 5 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$119k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-9%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue 0%
  • THE CARYING PLACE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue +258%
  • TL
    Transition LifeCare
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -9%
  • TR
    TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
2
The Caring Place Inc

The caring place provides inclusive service, shelter and ongoing support for people experiencing domestic violence. through advocacy, education, and awareness, we empower people to build supportive, respectful, compassionate relationships.

—
3
C a R E dba the John 3 16 Center

The organization's mission is: We are guided by our Christian faith to address the impact of poverty and trauma on families with children in Halifax, Northampton, and Warren counties. We do this through advocacy, education, empowerment,…

Crime & Legal
4
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
5
Trc the Recovery Center

Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.

Health
6
Changed Choices Inc

To provide counseling, personal development programs, basic physical needs, transitional assistance, and family support to assure rehabilitation and post-release transition of incarcerated women who have committed to making positive,…

Crime & Legal
7
Caring Across Generations Inc

Our mission is to change our culture and policy in America to value and support caregiving. To that end, we seek to transform cultural norms and narratives about aging, disability and care; to win federal and state-level policy change; and…

Health
8
The Community Table Inc

To provide nutritious meals to the hungry and food insecure in Jackson County, NC in a welcoming environment. We do this through our soup kitchen, food pantry and community garden programs.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Center for Youth Services Inc

We partner with youth to realize their full potential, by creating opportunities, removing barriers, and promoting racial justice.

Human Services
10
Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…

Human Services
11
Caramore Community

To empower adults living with severe and persistent mental illness in north carolina with the tools to lead meaningful and independent lives.

—
12
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Second Chance Pet Adoptions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INCTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE CARYING PLACE INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual gr…Transition LifeCare: $5,000 · OtherTransition Li…TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $2,500 · OtherTRIANGLE RESI…The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Young M…THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER …SECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTIONS INC: $4,500 · AnimalsA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $4,000 · Food & NutritionYouth Golf Foundation of the Carolinas: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$60,000Housing & Shelter$45,000Other$17,500Human Services$15,000Animals$4,500Food & Nutrition$4,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTIONS INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Golf Foundation of the Carolinas: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Best in Giving Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Best in Giving Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Best in Giving Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Best in Giving Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Best in Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph