Loading…
· Private foundation
BERNARD AND HEIDI BALDWIN PRIVATE FDN TRUST 12-15-06
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$6k
Granted FY2024
7
Grants
4
Communities
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of BERNARD AND HEIDI BALDWIN PRIVATE FDN TRUST 12-15-06’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
—
2021
uva
2022
—
2023
greaterlybgchurch
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$357k
Total assets
Largest grants
- UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL VA$2,000
- VIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$1,500
- AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
- TALL TIMBERS$500
- CENTRA FOUNDATION$500
- MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER LYBG$250
- MARCH OF DIMES$100
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 47% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31k · 13 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
13
16
Total granted
$31k
$9k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+14%
+57%
Still filing today
31%
25%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL VA4× · 2020–2024 · $7k
- VEVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $7k
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH2× · 2020–2021 · $5k
Funded once
- LTLOST TREE CHAPELone grant, 2022 · $2k
- TETHE EAST HARLEM SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $1k
- LTLOST TREE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Carilion Medical Center
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.
Health
2
Carilion Franklin Memorial Hospital
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.
Health
3
Carilion Clinic
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.
Health
4
University of Virginia Law School
The primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds to benefit the uva law school.
Education
5
Carilion New River Valley Medical Center
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.
Health
6
Virginia Association of Health Plans
Provide Virginia health plans a voice in promoting quality and affordable healthcare through advocacy, communication, education, and research.
—
7
Virginia Association of Community Banks
To provide undiluted advocacy, targeted education and quality collaboration for virginia's community banks.
—
8
Eastern Virginia Medical School Foundation
The Eastern Virginia Medical School Foundation serves to strengthen the financial security of the Eastern Virginia Medical School by accepting, investing and managing gifts, donations and bequests.
Education
9
Virginia Commonwealth University Foundat
To support the educational,scientific & charitable activities of vcu.
Education
10
Virginia Health Catalyst
Vhc is an alliance of over 100 individual and organizational partners striving to integrate oral health into all aspects of health care through education, public awareness and advocacy to ensure all virginians have access to oral health…
—
11
Virginia Association of Science
The organization's purpose is to promote excellence in teaching science and to provide communication amoung science teachers in Virginia.
Education
12
Virginia Afl-Cio
The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…
Employment
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Randolph College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$35,200Health$2,850Education$1,000Crime & Legal$750Arts & Culture$100Civil Rights$50
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Greater Lynchburg Community FoundationVA18.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · The Al Stroobants Foundation · Foster Foundation · Easley Char Irr Tua 5019004715 · Centra Health Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation BERNARD AND HEIDI BALDWIN PRIVATE FDN TRUST 12-15-06 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 541548564 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Bernard and Heidi Baldwin Private Fdn Trust 12-15-06?
Find your warmest path to Bernard and Heidi Baldwin Private Fdn Trust 12-15-06 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines