· Private foundation
Schewel Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA | $75,000 |
| CAMP KUM-BA-YAH | $25,000 |
| LYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS | $20,000 |
| JUBILEE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $10,000 |
| INTERFAITH OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| LYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD | $10,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $10,000 |
| AMAZEMENT SQUARE | $10,000 |
| PARKVIEW MISSION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $10,000 |
| LYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE | $10,000 |
| BRINGING ANIMAL RENOVATIONS TO CAMPBELL COUNTY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC5× · 2017–2023 · $130k · revenue +0%- RHRUSH HOMES INC5× · 2017–2023 · $89k · revenue +250%
- CKCamp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc3× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +222%
Funded once
- CVCENTRAL VIRGINIA YMCAone grant, 2022 · $50k
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL VAone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue -17%
- RRROANOKE REBOS INCone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
Provide services to individuals with disabilities to enable them to become fully integrated into society and achieve personal independence.
VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.
Furtherance of economic growth, education, training and development
Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.
Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.
The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.
Dlcv's mission is to advance independence, choice and self-determination; protect legal, human, and civil rights; and eliminate abuse, neglect and discrimination of people with disabilities through zealous and uncompromising legal advocacy…
VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.
To provide "dignity in living" for senior adults who reside in this planned services community.
To provide a solid liberal arts and christian education program to all students
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bring Animal Renovations to Campbell County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds RUSH HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER LYNCHBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Camp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds AMAZEMENT SQUARE ↗
- Who funds ENDSTATION THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA ON THE JAMES ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL VA ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' HAVEN A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Downtown Lynchburg Association ↗
- Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds VECTOR SPACE ↗
- Who funds Lynchburg Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · The Al Stroobants Foundation · Easley Char Irr Tua 5019004715 · Centra Health Inc · Foster Foundation · Carrington Family Foundation · M4k Lynchburg Inc · The Harry D Forsyth Foundation · Centra Health Foundation · Liberty University Inc · Retail Merchants Foundation- Ima 41-7022592 · The Imperial Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schewel Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Schewel Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Schewel Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.