Skip to content

· Private foundation

Berman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$22k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

70% of Berman Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Madison Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
5
’18
4
’19
6
’20
6
’21
5
’22
6
’23
5
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$150kArts & Culture$39kCivil Rights$7kReligion$7kMembership Benefit$3kInternational$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$500
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$216k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON$22,000
TEMPLE OF BETH EL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC$1,500
MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN$1,500
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,025
WAISMAN CENTER$525
OVERTURE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$300
WI CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$300
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUILD HALL: $2k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION FOR UKRAINE RELIEF: $1k → 17%PBS WISCONSIN: $2k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION FOR UKRAINE RELIEF: $1k → 17%PBS WISCONSIN: $1k → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $3k → 17%WAISMAN CENTER: $525 → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $3k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE WAISMAN CENTER: $500 → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE WAISMAN CENTER: $500 → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%WAISMAN CENTER: $500 → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2k → 17%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $22k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $21k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $20k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $20k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $19k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $18k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $18k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $17k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON: $17k → 10%JEWISH BURIAL ASSOCIATION OF MADISON: $3k → 10%TEMPLE OF BETH EL: $3k → 10%TEMPLE OF BETH EL: $2k → 10%TEMPLE OF BETH EL: $2k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL: $750 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Berman Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 86%.

Berman Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against -80% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$65k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-80%

Still filing today

45%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +66%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +78%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE WAISMAN CENTER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • JB
    JEWISH BURIAL ASSOCIATION OF MADISON INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -80%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • UC
    UW CARBONE CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Wisconsin Laborers' District Council

To protect and improve the lives of its members through family supporting wages and benefits, as well as through programs and services designed to make its members the safest, most skilled and productive workers in the laborers industry.

—
5
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison wisconsin as either police officers, detectives, investigators or sergeants.

—
6
Jewish Social Services of Madison Inc

Jewish social services of madison empowers families and individuals across generations and cultures to build community and self-sufficiency, with a strong commitment to the jewish community and inspired by jewish values. we offer services…

—
7
University of Wisconsin Foundation

To promote the welfare of and advance the objectives of the university of wisconsin-madison by encouraging the interest, engagement, and financial support of alumni, donors, and friends in the life of the university and with each other.

Education
8
League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Inc

The league of women voters of wisconsin (lwvwi) is a nonpartisan political organization. we encourage informed, active participation in government and work to increase understanding of major public policy issues. we influence public policy…

Civil Rights
9
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
10
Madison Teachers Inc

Madison teachers incorporated (mti) is a labor union representing teachers, substitute teachers, educational assistants, clerical/technical employees, and school security assistants who are employed by the madison metropolitan school…

—
11
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
12
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters

To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Madison Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON INC: $171,500 · ReligionJEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON INCTEMPLE BETH EL: $9,500 · OtherTEMPLE BETH E…FRIENDS OF WI PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $9,125 · OtherFRIENDS OF WI…Individual grant recipient: $2,950 · OtherIndividual gr…JEWISH FEDERATION FOR UKRAINE RELIEF: $2,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERA…Individual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WAISMAN CENTER: $1,500 · OtherOVERTURE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,300 · OtherWAISMAN CENTER: $1,025 · Other+3 more: $700 · OtherMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $16,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF ART…WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $12,075 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN PUB…WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $1,400 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $8,325 · Civil RightsJEWISH BURIAL ASSOCIATION OF MADISON INC: $3,000 · Membership Benefit
Religion$171,500Other$29,600Arts & Culture$29,475Civil Rights$8,325Membership Benefit$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON INC: $171,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $12,075 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $8,325 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WAISMAN CENTER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $1,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BURIAL ASSOCIATION OF MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WAISMAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Berman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Berman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Berman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph