Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bergeron Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$453kHealth$114kReligion$114kFood & Nutrition$91kHuman Services$71kHousing & Shelter$58kYouth Development$51kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE$20,000
HOWARD MENTAL HEALTH$10,000
COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
BISHOP'S FUND$5,000
SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
COTS$5,000
END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER$5,000
YMCA CAMP BELKNAP$3,500
ST SEBASTIAN'S SCHOOL$3,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BURLINGTON$3,000
OPERATION UNDERGROUND RAILROAD$2,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$2,500
THE CLARA MARTIN CENTER$2,000
SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA CAMP BELKNAP: $4k → 9%YMCA CAMP BELKNAP: $3k → 9%WESTON METCO SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $2k → 8%YMCA CAMP BELKNAP: $2k → 9%YMCA CAMP BELKNAP: $2k → 9%PATHWAY TO POSSIBLE: $1k → 8%YMCA CAMP BELKNAP: $1k → 9%WESTON METCO SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1k → 8%HOMESHARE VERMONT: $2k → 10%HOME SHARE VERMONT: $1k → 10%HOME SHARE VERMONT: $1k → 10%HOME SHARE VERMONT: $1k → 10%HOMESHARE VERMONT: $1k → 10%HOMESHARE VERMONT: $1k → 10%HOME SHARE VERMONT: $1k → 10%SHELBURNE FOOD SHELF INC: $500 → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%THE LUND FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 10%THE LUND FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 10%THE LUND FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 45 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
13

Total granted

$1.0M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-5%

Still filing today

42%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +55%
  • CO
    COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +23%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURLINGTON INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -8%
  • UH
    UVM HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TENACITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Vermont Family Network Inc

Vfn's mission is to empower and support all vermont families of children with special needs.

Human Services
5
Governor's Institutes of Vermont

Giv empowers young people with intensive, hands-on learning experiences in college settings which inspire their academic and creative passions, build confidence and leadership, and expand their sense of possibility.

6
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
7
Voices for Vermonts Children

To promote public policy that enhances the lives of children and youth in vermont.

8
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
9
Vermont Achievement Center Inc

Through flexible, diverse and responsive programs, vermont achievement center, inc. (vac) provides a foundation of life skills to prepare individuals to reach their full potential as contributing members of society. all people are capable…

Education
10
The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health
11
Berkshire Medical Center Inc

The mission of berkshire medical center is to advance health and wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming, inclusive, and personalized environment.

Health
12
Ywca of Vermont Inc

Ywca vermont is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Vermont and the most unlike its peers is Weston Metco Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#15#23#22#14#21#9#13
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr20%28%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr20%10%20–35yr16%70%35–55yr17%15%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
8%
489/6,079

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT — $112,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONTCHITTENDEN EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF — $70,000 · OtherCHITTENDEN EMERGENCY FOOD SHELFST MARK CATHOLIC PARISH — $61,000 · OtherST MARK CATHOLIC PARISHIndividual grant recipient — $47,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOWARD MENTAL HEALTH — $36,000 · OtherHOWARD MENTAL HEALTHBISHOP'S FUND — $35,000 · OtherBISHOP'S FUNDRICE MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL — $28,000 · OtherTURNING POINT CENTER — $25,000 · Other+40 more — $206,500 · Other+40 moreSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE — $260,000 · EducationSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGESPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesYMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesHOMESHARE VERMONT INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesWESTON METCO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesLund Family Center Inc — $3,000 · Human Services+2 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterFamilies in Transition — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURLINGTON INC — $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAPE COD INC — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $14,000 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $8,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $5,000 · HealthTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT HEALTH NETWORK HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE — $500 · Health
Other$621,000Education$260,000Human Services$60,500Housing & Shelter$50,000Youth Development$34,500Food & Nutrition$14,000Health$13,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE — $260,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURLINGTON INC — $31,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFamilies in Transition — $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $14,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC — $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMESHARE VERMONT INC — $7,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCLARA MARTIN CENTER INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC — $5,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHUNGER FREE VERMONT INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAPE COD INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTON METCO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $3,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLund Family Center Inc — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ON THE BALL INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTENACITY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAY TO POSSIBLE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENACOOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF VERMONT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHELBURNE FOOD SHELF INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE
  • Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURLINGTON INC
  • Who funds Families in Transition
  • Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE
  • Who funds YMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds HOMESHARE VERMONT INC
  • Who funds CLARA MARTIN CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE VERMONT INC
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ben & Jerry's Foundation IncVT25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Antonio B and Rita M Pomerleau Foundation Inc · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · The Kelsey Trust · Francis T & Louis T Nichols Foundation · The University of Vermont Medical Center · The Morris & Bessie Altman Foundation · George W Mergens Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · The Onda Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bergeron Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 24%
  • Pathway to Possible Inc84% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc52% of income from government
  • Lund Family Center Inc34% of income from government
  • Homeshare Vermont Inc32% of income from government
  • Hunger Free Vermont Inc24% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc23% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Club of Burlington Inc16% of income from government
  • Clara Martin Center Inc12% of income from government
  • Saint Michael's College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph