Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bergen Highlandsramsey Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Education$37kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$24kEnvironment$10kArts & Culture$10kInternational$9kCommunity Improvement$3kReligion$1kOther$45k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$317k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$17,132
Individual grant recipient$7,250
CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION$7,050
WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTH$6,050
DISASTER AID USA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
SHELTER BOX USA$1,000
STREET 2 STREET$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SHELTER BOX USA: $1k → 10%OASIS A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDRE: $6k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE OF NEW JERSEY: $500 → 16%DISASTER AID USA: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $7k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $5k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Bergen Highlandsramsey Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Bergen Highlandsramsey Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$75k · 4 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$75k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue +72%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY
    3× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +178%
  • WM
    WELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • TT
    TABLE TO TABLE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +13%
  • MM
    MAHWAH MUSEUM SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +74% · 46% of their budget
  • WT
    WISE TROPICS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
2
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
3
Nourishnj Inc

Nourish.nj provides immediate access to healthy food as the first step toward a stable future. as a center of support, we connect our neighbors to essential community resources and provide direct services to address the root causes of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
5
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
6
Masbia Relief

The masbia soup kitchen network provides emergency food and supplies free of charge to people in need due to financial status or because of natural disasters via ready-to-eat nutritious meals, raw groceries and supplies.

Food & Nutrition
7
Veggies to Table

Veggies to table grows top-quality organic produce and flowers to donate to local people experiencing food insecurity. we create lasting community connections through our volunteer program and provide education around healthy food and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
9
Foodstock Nj Inc

To facilitate the movement of food from those who have been abundantly blessed to those who are in need and to inspire future generations to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
Planet Wise Solutions

Planet Wise Solutions provides culturally appropriate co-created technologies with indigenous communities in the rainforest regions of Chiapas and Oaxaca Mexico. Our primary focus is the implantation of high efficiency clean cookstoves,…

International
11
Rescue Mission of Trenton New Jersey

Rescue Mission of Trenton, New Jersey serves the truly needy men and women who have no place to turn for shelter, food, and clothing. The Organization provides a safe, clean, and warm refuge for the homeless, the hungry, the transient, and…

Human Services
12
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis - a Haven for Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mahwah Museum Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $17,132 · OtherSTONY BROOK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTH — $6,050 · OtherWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $3,000 · OtherEVA'S VILLAGE INC+2 more — $1,500 · OtherRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $37,300 · EducationRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY — $12,881 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FOOD A…OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN F…DISASTER AID USA INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesDISASTER AID USA …SHELTERBOX USA INC — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesTABLE TO TABLE INC — $24,059 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO TABLE I…WISE TROPICS INC — $9,916 · EnvironmentMAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZATION INC — $500 · EnvironmentMAHWAH MUSEUM SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureWELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC — $9,000 · International
Other$48,682Education$37,300Human Services$24,881Food & Nutrition$24,059Environment$10,416Arts & Culture$10,000International$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $37,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC — $24,059 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY — $12,881 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAHWAH MUSEUM SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetWISE TROPICS INC — $9,916 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC — $9,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISASTER AID USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bergen Highlandsramsey Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc34% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc19% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation1% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bergen Highlandsramsey Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bergen Highlandsramsey Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph