Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$97kArts & Culture$14kPublic Benefit$8kReligion$7kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$2kEmployment$1kCrime & Legal$1k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREE PRESS$5,000
SHLB$2,500
UCC OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION$1,500
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE$500
TRPC INC$500
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FREE PRESS: $5k → 12%SCHOOLS HEATLH & LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $6k → 14%NATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE: $1k → 15%CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OC INC: $2k → 4%SCHOOLS HEATLH & LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $5k → 14%UCC OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION: $2k → 4%SCHOOLS HEATLH & LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $5k → 14%UCC OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION: $2k → 4%SCHOOLS HEATLH & LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $5k → 14%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OC INC: $2k → 4%SHLB: $3k → 14%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OC INC: $2k → 4%SCHOOLS HEATLH & LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $3k → 14%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OC INC: $2k → 4%SHLB: $3k → 14%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTOCINC: $1k → 4%SCHOOLS HEATLH & LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $2k → 14%HOPEWELL FUND: $1k → 14%NEW VENTURE FUND: $518 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%FREE PRESS DC: $500 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%FREE PRESS DC: $500 → 14%NEW VENTURE FUND: $500 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%FREE PRESS DC: $500 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%FREE PRESS DC: $500 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $500 → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $70k → 14%FREE PRESS DC: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Benton Institute for Broadband & Society’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Benton Institute for Broadband & Societylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 9 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$127k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+39%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2025 · $71k · revenue +35%
  • SH
    SCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $26k · revenue +64%
  • FP
    FREE PRESS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • ND
    NATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -48%
  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTOCINC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • TC
    THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Technology Policy Institute
International
2
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Free Press Action Fund

Free press action fund fights for your rights to connect and communicate. we fight to save the free and open internet, curb runaway media consolidation, protect press freedom, and promote digital civil rights. we believe that change…

Civil Rights
5
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Center for Democracy and Technology

Advocating for public policies that advance democratic values in the digital age.

Civil Rights
8
Chamber of Progress

Chamber of progress is a center-left tech industry coalition devoted to a progressive society, economy, workforce, and consumer climate. we back public policies that will build a fairer, more inclusive country in which all people benefit…

Community Improvement
9
News Media Alliance

The news media alliance (nma) is a nonprofit organization representing nearly 2,000 news media organizations and their multi-media platform businesses in the us, canada and europe.

—
10
World Wide Web Consortium Inc

Making the web work for everyone. W3C brings together global stakeholders to develop open standards that enable a World Wide Web that connects and empowers humanity.

Science & Tech
11
National Cable Satellite Corporation

Provide the public access to the live gavel-to-gavel proceedings of both houses of the us congress, and other forums where public policy is discussed, debated, and decided - all without editing, commentary or analysis and with a balanced…

Arts & Culture
12
Federal Communications Bar Association

To promote the development, interpretation and practice of communications law and policy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund; the most unlike its peers is Telecommunications Policy Research Conference Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $70,609 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYSCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $26,088 · EducationSCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION+1 more: $1,000 · EducationUNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OC INC: $6,000 · OtherUNITED CHURCH…SHLB: $5,000 · OtherSHLBUCC OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION: $3,000 · OtherUCC OFFICE OF…UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTOCINC: $1,000 · OtherUNITED CHURCH…TRPC INC: $1,000 · OtherTRPC INCFREE PRESS: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTelecommunications Policy Research Conference Inc: $4,000 · Public BenefitPUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $3,500 · Public BenefitNATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE: $1,193 · EmploymentNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,018 · EnvironmentHOPEWELL FUND: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Education$97,697Other$16,000Arts & Culture$7,500Public Benefit$7,500Employment$1,193Environment$1,018Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $70,609 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $26,088 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFREE PRESS: $7,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTelecommunications Policy Research Conference Inc: $4,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE: $1,193 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,018 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FREE PRESS ↗
  • Who funds Telecommunications Policy Research Conference Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benton Institute for Broadband & Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benton Institute for Broadband & Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph