Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benjamin S Levine Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$81kEducation$68kHuman Services$6kReligion$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kFood & Nutrition$3kArts & Culture$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$293k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NJ Leep$10,000
Barnert Temple$1,527
Make A Wish Foundation$1,000
American Red Cross$1,000
Macular Degeneration Research$1,000
Jewish Home Foundation$1,000
Michael J Fox Foundation$1,000
Planned Parenthood$1,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$1,000
Play for Pink$775
Lets Win Pancreatic Cancer$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $375) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Ronald McDonald House: $275 → 8%Center for Food Action: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 30 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
47

Total granted

$148k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+43%

Still filing today

17%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NJ LEEP Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +61%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +40%
  • LW
    LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • PR
    Parkinsons Research Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • NP
    NJ Pandemic Relief Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • UO
    University of Pennsylania
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epilepsy Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenthood: $12,250 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodSt Jude Hospital: $10,028 · OtherSt Jude HospitalPlay for Pink: $6,125 · OtherPlay for PinkMacular Degeneration Research: $5,750 · OtherMacular Degeneration ResearchMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $5,500 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterSusan G Komen Race for a Cure: $5,305 · OtherSusan G Komen Race for a CureMake A Wish Foundation: $5,000 · OtherSt Jude Childrens Research: $4,000 · OtherAmerican Cancer Society: $3,500 · Other+51 more: $38,810 · Other+51 moreNJ LEEP Inc: $61,550 · EducationNJ LEEP Inc+3 more: $1,750 · EducationLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $500 · HealthSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $500 · HealthGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $250 · HealthTRI-BORO VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 · HealthBRAD KAMINSKY FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthFeeding America: $2,500 · Food & NutritionHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100 · InternationalTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Religion
Other$96,268Education$63,300Health$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Philanthropy$1,550International$1,350Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNJ LEEP Inc: $61,550 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHousing Plus Solutions Inc: $281 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MARYLAND INC: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-BORO VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAD KAMINSKY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $109 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NJ LEEP Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Pledgeling Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benjamin S Levine Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benjamin S Levine Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Grounds for Sculpture Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Benjamin S Levine’s filings →

More from the funding graph