Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks USA Mission Viejo Lodge 2444

To inculcate the principles of charity, justice, brotherly love and fidelity; to recognize a belief in god; to promote the welfare and enhance the happiness of its members; to quicken the spirit of american patriotism; to cultivate good fellowship; to perpetuate itself as a fraternal organization, and to provide for its governance, the…

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS USA MISSION VIEJO LODGE 2444’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $88,911 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $162,103 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,192 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
$33,110
Median grant
3
States reached
$844k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS ASSOCI$38,200
ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$33,110
DICTIONARY PROJECT THE$10,601
MISSION VIEJO HS$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CA-HI ELKS ASSOCIATION: $14k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$726k · 4 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$726k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BENEVOLENT PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF USA CALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $334k · revenue +25%
  • EN
    ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $311k · revenue -1%
  • TD
    THE DICTIONARY PROJECT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $47k · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +23%
  • CE
    CALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS MAJOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +27%
  • StandUp for Kids
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks Arcadia Lodge No 2025

To include the principles of charity, justice, brotherly love and fidelity; to recognize a belief in god; to promote the welfare and enhance the happiness or its members; to quicken the spirit of american patriotism; to cultivate good…

2
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
3
California Optometric Association

The mission of the california optometric association is to support and advance the profession of optometry to assure quality health care for all californians.

4
Elks National Veterans Service Commission

In partnership with thousands of elks volunteers, the commission's programs offer direct service to veterans and military members in need throughout the nation. our programs help hospitalized veterans recover and thrive, support veterans…

Philanthropy
5
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

8
Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Affton Lodge #2635 Bpoe

To inculcate the principles of charity, justice, brotherly love and fidelity; to recognize a belief in god; to promote the welfare and enhance the happiness of its members; to quicken the spirit of american patriotism; to cultivate good…

9
Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks

Fraternal organization that coordinates various programs for state associations and subordinate lodges of the order of elks.

10
Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Madisonville Lodge No 738

The organization's primary mission is to facilitate a fraternal environment for its members, as well as to contribute to the betterment of individuals and the community through charitable activities.

11
National Education Association of the United States

Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

12
San Diego Municipal Employees Assn

The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elks National Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is StandUp for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BENEVOLENT PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF USA CALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS ASSOCIATION — $334,348 · OtherBENEVOLENT PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF USA CALIFOR…+2 more — $12,500 · OtherELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $310,907 · PhilanthropyELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INCTHE DICTIONARY PROJECT — $46,824 · EducationORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL — $34,000 · Crime & LegalMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION — $5,052 · HealthCALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS MAJOR PROJECT INC — $13,810 · Human Services
Other$346,848Philanthropy$310,907Education$46,824Crime & Legal$34,000Health$25,052Human Services$13,810

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBENEVOLENT PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF USA CALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS ASSOCIATION — $334,348 over 4y, 11% of budgetELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $310,907 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DICTIONARY PROJECT — $46,824 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL — $34,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA-HAWAII ELKS MAJOR PROJECT INC — $13,810 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStandUp for Kids — $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION — $5,052 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks USA Mission Viejo Lodge 2444 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks USA Mission Viejo Lodge 2444?

    Find your warmest path to Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks USA Mission Viejo Lodge 2444 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph