Skip to content
Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the USA 1389 Nampa at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the USA 1389 Nampa

Our mission is community charity and veterans activities.

$12k
Granted FY2018
16
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2018 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $9,216, the rows itemized in this filing. The $11,516 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,300 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,380
BETTY HISE CANCER FOUNDATION$1,500
NAMPA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$900
BOISE RESCUE MISSION$750
NAMPA SALVATION ARMY$636
BALLET FOLKLORICO LINDO$500
CAST FOR KIDS$500
NAMPA FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER$500
IVAL$500
NAMPA SENIOR CENTER$400
VENTURE CREW$200
MEALS ON WHEELS$200
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF IDAHO$100
COLUMBIA HIGH SCHOOL$50
NAMPA CHRSTIAN SCHOOL$50
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NAMPA FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elderly Opportunity Agency Inc

Providing senior citizens programs and housing projects.

Food & Nutrition
2
Senior Citizens Community Center Inc

Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.

Human Services
3
Idaho Veterans Network Corporation

Idaho Veterans Network is a group who advocates, shares information, solves problems for veterans and their families in crisis, and supports each other. This is a place of trust. We are strictly a non-profit volunteer organization with a…

Public Benefit
4
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
5
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
6
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
7
Idaho Falls Fraternal Order of Police Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
8
Hospice of Eastern Idaho Inc

Compassionate care as it should be.

Health
9
Coeur Dalene Homes Inc Dba Orchard Ridge Senior Living

The organization's mission is to provide and to assist other organizations in providing affordable elderly christian housing in the north idaho area. this is done through an affiliation with christian churches who are interested in…

Housing & Shelter
10
Great Falls-Cascade County Senior Citizens Center

Provide recreational and education programs, social activities, low cost meals and a monthly newsletter to senior citizens of cascade county

—
11
Disabled American Veterans Department of Idaho

Empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity

—
12
Ball Ventures Legacy Foundation Inc

We build and enhance the communities of idaho by prioritizing funding projects that enrich the public interest and well-being of idahoans.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elks National Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Betty Hise for Cancer Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOISE RESCUE MISSION: $750 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONBALLET FOLKLORICO LINDO: $500 · OtherBALLET FOLKLORICO LINDOIDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $500 · OtherIDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE IN…KIDS FIRST CAST INC: $500 · OtherKIDS FIRST CAST INCVENTURE CREW: $200 · OtherVENTURE CREWCALDWELL MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $200 · OtherCALDWELL MEALS ON WHEELS INCSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $100 · Other+3 more: $150 · OtherELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,380 · PhilanthropyELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INCBETTY HISE FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $1,500 · HealthBETTY HISE FOR CAN…THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $900 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & …Family Promise of Spokane: $636 · ReligionFAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION OF IDAHO INC: $500 · Human ServicesAUTUMNGOLD SENIOR SERVICES INC: $400 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,900Philanthropy$2,380Health$1,500Youth Development$900Religion$636Human Services$500Housing & Shelter$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETTY HISE FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane: $636 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION OF IDAHO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUTUMNGOLD SENIOR SERVICES INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALDWELL MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate Banc…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the USA 1389 Nampa funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the USA 1389 Nampa. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the USA 1389 Nampa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home