· Private foundation
Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $166k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE | $75,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $50,000 |
| AVODAH - THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC | $48,500 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC | $35,000 |
| SCHECHTER INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES INC | $35,000 |
| JARC | $22,000 |
| GESHER HUMAN SERVICES | $15,000 |
| HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CNTR FOR JEWISH ARAB EDU IN ISRAEL | $10,000 |
| TIKKUN HAYAM REPAIR THE SEA INC | $8,500 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT | $7,000 |
| YAD EZRA | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $5,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $3,000 |
| JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK | $3,000 |
| FOOD GATHERERS | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD8× · 2017–2025 · $363k · revenue +28%
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE3× · 2023–2025 · $250k · revenue +26%
- ATAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC8× · 2017–2025 · $232k · revenue +107%
Funded once
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Incone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +1%- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS DENTAL VOLUNTEERS FOR ISRAELone grant, 2021 · $15k
- CFCENTER FOR JEWISH ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRAELone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.
The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…
To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
The jewish voters unite's mission is to educate and mobilize jewish communities to participate in every election and make their voices heard at the polls.
Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.
As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…
To further the welfare of the jewish community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Summer in the City. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JARC ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds TIKKUN HAYAM-REPAIR THE SEA INC ↗
- Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds KADIMA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Detroit Jews for Justice ↗
- Who funds HAZON INC ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL ↗
- Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURE IN ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds US FRIENDS OF ERAN INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Woll-Yellin Family Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · The Driker Family Foundation · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Yiddish Book Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.