Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$358k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$453kEnvironment$412kReligion$374kHuman Services$260kCivil Rights$247kHealth$103kPhilanthropy$88kEmployment$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE$75,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$50,000
AVODAH - THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC$48,500
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$35,000
SCHECHTER INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES INC$35,000
JARC$22,000
GESHER HUMAN SERVICES$15,000
HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CNTR FOR JEWISH ARAB EDU IN ISRAEL$10,000
TIKKUN HAYAM REPAIR THE SEA INC$8,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT$7,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$5,000
YAD EZRA$5,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$3,000
FOOD GATHERERS$3,000
JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JAFCO - JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $850 → 13%JAFCO JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $500 → 13%JAFCO JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $500 → 13%JAFCO CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 8%JARC: $22k → 8%JARC: $15k → 8%JARC: $11k → 8%JARC: $10k → 8%JARC: $6k → 8%JARC: $6k → 8%LIGHTHOUSE OF S OAKLAND COUNTY: $2k → 8%LIGHTHOUSE OF S OAKLAND COUNTY: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 51 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
28

Total granted

$1.7M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+6%

Still filing today

76%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD
    8× · 2017–2025 · $363k · revenue +28%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $250k · revenue +26%
  • AT
    AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $232k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS DENTAL VOLUNTEERS FOR ISRAEL
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION T CHIYAH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
7
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Voters Unite Inc

The jewish voters unite's mission is to educate and mobilize jewish communities to participate in every election and make their voices heard at the polls.

Religion
10
The Jewish Federation of Nwi Inc

Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.

—
11
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement
12
Flint Jewish Federation

To further the welfare of the jewish community

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Summer in the City. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/68
Grantees still filing
44/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies Inc: $165,000 · OtherSchechter Institute of Jewish Stud…ISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUE: $103,100 · OtherISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUEJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $39,750 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL…FOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE MESORATI-JUDAISM IN ISRAEL: $37,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE MESORA…YAD EZRA: $32,500 · OtherFIRST HEBREW CONGREGATION OF SOUTH HAVEN: $25,504 · Other+60 more: $271,575 · Other+60 moreFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $363,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE…TIKKUN HAYAM-REPAIR THE SEA INC: $33,000 · EnvironmentTIKKUN HAYAM-REPAIR …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $250,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SE…JARC: $69,500 · Human ServicesJARC+3 more: $6,350 · Human ServicesPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $194,700 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL E…JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $49,012 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDER…+3 more: $7,949 · PhilanthropyThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $100,000 · InternationalThe American…HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $52,000 · InternationalHAND IN HAND…NEW ISRAEL FUND: $36,300 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL F…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $22,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEW…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · International+5 more: $22,300 · International+5 moreAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $232,100 · Community ImprovementAVODAH THE …+1 more: $1,000 · Community ImprovementGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $85,000 · Employment
Other$674,429Environment$396,000Human Services$325,850Philanthropy$251,661International$242,600Community Improvement$233,100Employment$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $363,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $250,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $232,100 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $194,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJARC: $69,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $52,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $49,012 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $39,750 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $36,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTIKKUN HAYAM-REPAIR THE SEA INC: $33,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetYAD EZRA: $32,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKADIMA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MICHIGAN: $12,916 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetDetroit Jews for Justice: $12,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetHAZON INC: $10,680 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $10,476 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $7,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC: $6,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURE IN ISRAEL INC: $5,432 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABONIM DROR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF ERAN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KIDUM INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $2,949 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFJC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER IN THE CITY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $1,850 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds TIKKUN HAYAM-REPAIR THE SEA INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds KADIMA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Jews for Justice ↗
  • Who funds HAZON INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURE IN ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Jewish FoundationMI29.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Woll-Yellin Family Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · The Driker Family Foundation · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Keshet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ben N Teitel’s filings →

More from the funding graph