Skip to content
Belmar Child & Family Center at a glance

· Public charity

Belmar Child & Family Center

The center provides counseling services to help children and adolescents learn to cope with emotional problems.

$407k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL$56,801
REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL$50,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$50,000
VOX FEMINA$20,000
CHAI LIFELINE$20,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$20,000
AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING$20,000
SOUTH BAY HANDS ON ART$20,000
REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL$20,000
AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING$20,000
TEMPLE ISAIAH$20,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$20,000
CHAI LIFELINE$10,000
PBS - SOCAL KCET$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
4
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Vip Community Mental Health Center Inc

Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence

Health
9
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
10
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
11
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
12
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Friendship Circle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL: $126,801 · OtherREISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOLTEMPLE ISAIAH: $20,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISAIAHSOUTH BAY HANDS ON ART HANDS ON ART: $20,000 · OtherSOUTH BAY HANDS ON ART HANDS ON ARTAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE: $40,000 · HealthAIRPORT MARINA COUNSEL…CHAI LIFELINE INC: $30,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INCVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $70,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVI…THE PAINTED TURTLE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURT…FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDSHIP CIRCL…VOX FEMINA LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$166,801Health$80,000Human Services$70,000Youth Development$60,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVOX FEMINA LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Belmar Child & Family Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Belmar Child & Family Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Belmar Child & Family Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home