Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Belmar Child & Family Center

The center provides counseling services to help children and adolescents learn to cope with emotional problems.

$407k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL$56,801
REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL$50,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$50,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$20,000
REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL$20,000
VOX FEMINA$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$20,000
SOUTH BAY HANDS ON ART$20,000
AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING$20,000
CHAI LIFELINE$20,000
AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING$20,000
TEMPLE ISAIAH$20,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$20,000
CHAI LIFELINE$10,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
4
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Vip Community Mental Health Center Inc

Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence

Health
9
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
10
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
11
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

12
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Friendship Circle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOL — $126,801 · OtherREISS DAVIS GRADUATE SCHOOLTEMPLE ISAIAH — $20,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISAIAHSOUTH BAY HANDS ON ART HANDS ON ART — $20,000 · OtherSOUTH BAY HANDS ON ART HANDS ON ARTAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE — $40,000 · HealthAIRPORT MARINA COUNSEL…CHAI LIFELINE INC — $30,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INCVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $10,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $70,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVI…THE PAINTED TURTLE — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURT…FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDSHIP CIRCL…VOX FEMINA LOS ANGELES — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$166,801Health$80,000Human Services$70,000Youth Development$60,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE — $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVOX FEMINA LOS ANGELES — $20,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Belmar Child & Family Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph