Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bell Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$51kHealth$23kEducation$15kPhilanthropy$9kYouth Development$9kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$4kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300
Median grant
4
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,700
Croswell Opera House$6,250
Hospice of Lenawee$6,000
Health Network Foundation$3,000
Lenawee Community Foundation$2,000
Boys & Girls Club of Lenawee$1,250
Adrian Armory Community Center$1,000
Adrian College$1,000
WGTE Public Media$500
Lehigh University$300
Adrian Center for the Arts$250
Kalamazoo College$200
Toledo Museum of Art$150
Hillsdale College$100
Salvation Army$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%GOOD SHEPHERD HOME: $200 → 12%Health Network Foundation: $3k → 17%Adrian Armory Community Center: $2k → 12%ADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 12%Adrian Armory Community Center: $1k → 12%Adrian Amory Community Center: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
VA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 21 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
24

Total granted

$111k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue +78%
  • AC
    ADRIAN COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +3%
  • SH
    SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AS
    Adrian Symphony Association
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Lenawee County
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • LC
    LENAWEE COMMUNITY CHORUS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
2
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
3
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
College for Creative Studies

The college for creative studies nurtures the creativity that is vital to the enrichment of modern culture. the college educates visual artists and designers, knowledgeable in varied fields, who will be leaders in creative professions that…

Education
6
Cleary University

To provide a business education that equips individuals to deliver superior service to employers and their communities.

Education
7
Peirce College

Organization's mission: peirce college empowers adult learners to improve their lives by achieving career goals through academic offerings aligned with evolving workforce needs.

8
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Lawrence University of Wisconsin

Lawrence university of wisconsin, through its undergraduate residential college and conservatory of music, educates students in the liberal arts and sciences. the university is devoted to excellence and integrity in all of its activities…

Education
11
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
12
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lenawee Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Adrian Schools Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIntegrated Health System Pr…Senior Residential CareSupportive Housing ServicesSchool District Education F…Arts & Culture OrganizationsCharter and Alternative Sch…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%11%5–10yr17%7%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr18%19%35–55yr19%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr18%20%35–55yr19%58%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
12%
1,887/15,354

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPICE OF LENAWEE — $16,600 · OtherHOSPICE OF LENAWEEIndividual grant recipient — $16,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLenawee Cares — $4,000 · OtherLenawee CaresWGTE PUBLIC MEDIA — $3,000 · OtherWGTE PUBLIC MEDIAAdrian Symphony Association — $2,500 · Other+27 more — $11,535 · Other+27 moreCROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION — $40,550 · Arts & CultureCROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS AS…+3 more — $1,050 · Arts & CultureADRIAN COLLEGE — $5,750 · EducationADRIAN COLLE…SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationSIENA HEIGHT…LEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $1,800 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVE…KALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $1,200 · EducationKALAMAZOO CO…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $600 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $200 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER — $3,750 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Human Services+1 more — $200 · Human ServicesBusiness Advisers of Cleveland — $250 · Community Improvement
Other$54,235Arts & Culture$41,600Education$14,550Philanthropy$9,200Youth Development$7,500Human Services$6,950Community Improvement$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION — $40,550 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF LENAWEE — $16,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE — $5,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER — $3,750 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART — $850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBusiness Advisers of Cleveland — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOME — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLEASANT GROVE HOTEL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADRIAN SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Enforcement United Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLENAWEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUREPSP INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBozeman Deaconess Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LENAWEE
  • Who funds LENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY
  • Who funds Business Advisers of Cleveland
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD HOME
  • Who funds PLEASANT GROVE HOTEL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ADRIAN SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MEMORYLANE CARE SERVICES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The S L Hickman Family FoundationOH24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The S L Hickman Family Foundation · Douglas and Mary Kapnick Family Foundation · Farver Foundation · Lenawee Community Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · The Murray Family Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz Foundation · Promedica Health System Inc · Sage Foundation · Elizabeth Ruthruff Wilson Foundation · Tlc Community Credit Union

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bell Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph