Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beavers Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$11MRecreation & Sports$275kArts & Culture$200kPhilanthropy$100kScience & Tech$25kEmployment$25kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k38 grants · $487k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $705k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY$250,000
ASU FOUNDATION$148,139
UC DAVIS ADVANCEMENT SERVICE$122,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
VIRGINIA TECH$75,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$60,000
CSULB 49ER FOUNDATION$50,000
THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION - CHICO STATE$50,000
UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CSU SACRAMENTO$50,000
MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONS INC$50,000
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$35,000
CHICO CM EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$18,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $100k → 15%NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $50k → 11%MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 16%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $300k → 16%UNIVESITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $100k → 10%SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 11%CAL POLY SLO: $440k → 12%CAL STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO: $200k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC: $100k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICO: $200k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO: $200k → 19%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $133k → 21%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY KANSAS: $50k → 18%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 20%MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $150k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $250k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $80k → 11%VIRGINIA TECH: $75k → 21%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $75k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $77k → 13%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 16%SAN DIEGO STATE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $200k → 11%CAL POLY SLO: $225k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE: $150k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC: $80k → 12%UC DAVIS ADVANCEMENT SERVICE: $122k → 16%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICO: $200k → 18%FRESNO STATE FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $125k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $80k → 9%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $80k → 11%SDSU FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $76k → 13%CAL STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO: $100k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICO: $125k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $204k → 13%CAL STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO: $100k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICO: $118k → 18%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $200k → 8%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH: $265k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH: $110k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH: $65k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
OR
SD
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 38 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
36

Total granted

$7.5M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+16%

Still filing today

29%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $979k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of the Pacific
    4× · 2019–2025 · $229k · revenue +26%
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +15%
  • CC
    CHICO CM EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2025 · $188k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $600k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $204k · revenue +16%
  • UV
    UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
2
Cal State East Bay Educational Foundation

To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…

Education
3
Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education
4
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
5
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
6
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
7
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
8
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
9
Cal State Fullerton Philanthropic Foundation

To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.

Philanthropy
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University Foundation At Sacramento State; the most unlike its peers is University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO STATE- FORT COLLINS: $721,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE- FORT COLLINSIndividual grant recipient: $665,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICO: $652,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICOCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION: $600,000 · OtherCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH: $482,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACHPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $450,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO: $415,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $367,500 · Other+58 more: $4,378,192 · Other+58 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $275,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Da…University of the Pacific: $228,500 · EducationUniversity of the Paci…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $203,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA…SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNI…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $182,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO…Montana State University Foundation Inc: $175,000 · EducationMontana State Universi…Oregon State University Foundation: $150,000 · EducationOregon State Universit…THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE: $150,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $148,139 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSI…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Education+10 more: $466,008 · Education+10 moreCHICO CM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $187,500 · Community ImprovementCAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,731,692Education$2,258,647Community Improvement$187,500Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $275,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $228,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $203,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICO CM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $187,500 over 3y, 20% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $182,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $175,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE: $150,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $148,139 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $67,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $61,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $5,008 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERGROUND CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICO CM EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beavers Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beavers Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Beavers Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Beavers Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beavers’ filings →

More from the funding graph