Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beaverdale Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$365k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$580kArts & Culture$465kEnvironment$445kHealth$330kYouth Development$110kCrime & Legal$95kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kEducation$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $335k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CONSERVATION FUND$45,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$25,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$25,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$25,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$25,000
TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TV$15,000
WGBH (BOSTON PUBLIC TELEVISION)$15,000
MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA$15,000
WETA (DC PUBLIC TELEVISION)$15,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$15,000
WTTW (CHICAGO PUBLIC TELEVISION)$15,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY - MN ND & SD$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASH DC$10,000
ZAHARA KATHAWALLA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $25k → 16%CARLETON COLLEGE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $25k → 11%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $20k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $25k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ILLINOIS: $25k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $50k → 7%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $50k → 7%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 17%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $50k → 7%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTA & THE DAKOTAS: $35k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 17%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $50k → 7%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTA & THE DAKOTAS: $25k → 14%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $50k → 7%GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD N CENTRAL STATES: $20k → 14%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $45k → 7%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA - TEEN PROSTITUTION MISSION: $15k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD N CENTRAL STATES: $20k → 14%WTTW (CHICAGO PUBLIC TELEVISION): $15k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $40k → 7%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $25k → 7%WETA (DC PUBLIC TELEVISION): $15k → 7%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $25k → 14%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $20k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $25k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $20k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $20k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $20k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $20k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $20k → 14%SAINT PATRICK'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $20k → 14%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $25k → 11%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $20k → 11%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $20k → 11%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $20k → 11%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 34 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

68%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthInternationalEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +40%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +140%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • SP
    SAINT PATRICK'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TI
    THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
2
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
5
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
6
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Minnesota Grocers Association

The minnesota grocers association advances the common interest of those engaged in all aspects of the food industry of mn as a leadership resource. the mga encourages and sponsors educational seminars, conventions and fosters the exchange…

—
9
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

—
10
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
11
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood North Central States; the most unlike its peers is Green Door. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $145,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA - TEEN PROSTITUTION MISSION: $70,000 · OtherWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA - TEEN PROST…TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TV: $65,000 · OtherTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TVPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTA & THE DAKOTAS: $60,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTA & THE DAKOTA…WETA (DC PUBLIC TELEVISION): $55,000 · OtherWETA (DC PUBLIC TELEVISION)NATURE CONSERVANCY - MN ND & SD: $55,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY - MN ND & SDWTTW (CHICAGO PUBLIC TELEVISION): $55,000 · OtherWTTW (CHICAGO PUBLIC TELEVISION)PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WASHINGTON DC - DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 · OtherWGBH (BOSTON PUBLIC TELEVISION): $45,000 · OtherRebuilding Together - Twin Cities: $70,000 · OtherRebuilding Together - Twin CitiesWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,000 · OtherZAHARA KATHAWALLA FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+11 more: $195,000 · Other+11 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $145,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $145,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BA…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $145,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEART…THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $360,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION …+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $95,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA O…MINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $55,000 · Arts & CultureMINNETONKA …HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY: $55,000 · Arts & CultureHANDEL AND …The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society: $40,000 · Arts & CultureThe Saint P…Planned Parenthood of Illinois: $75,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $70,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $15,000 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE: $15,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $75,000 · Crime & LegalNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$945,000Food & Nutrition$435,000Environment$370,000Arts & Culture$245,000Health$160,000International$160,000Crime & Legal$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $360,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $95,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $75,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRebuilding Together - Twin Cities: $70,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $55,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY: $55,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetZAHARA KATHAWALLA FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMinnesota Trout Unlimited: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together - Twin Cities ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
  • Who funds ZAHARA KATHAWALLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds GASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Trout Unlimited ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREEN DOOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mithun Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beaverdale Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beaverdale Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Handel and Haydn Society: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beaverdale’s filings →

More from the funding graph