Skip to content
Beaver Creek Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Beaver Creek Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$457kArts & Culture$240kHuman Services$73kHealth$51kEnvironment$44kPhilanthropy$35kAnimals$21kEmployment$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $157k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$36,000
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$34,000
BALLET WEST$30,000
WEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT FU$15,000
FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF$12,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WEBER SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
ONSTAGE OGDEN$7,500
OGDEN MUSICAL THEATRE$5,000
ECCLES ART CENTER$5,000
OGDEN NATURE CENTER$5,000
ENABLE UTAH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%ENCIRCLE: $15k → 8%OGDEN RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 9%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $2k → 9%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF: $12k → 9%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF: $10k → 9%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF: $10k → 9%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$864k · 18 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$864k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+2%

Still filing today

72%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $302k · revenue +40%
  • BW
    BALLET WEST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue +69%
  • WC
    Weber County School District Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +471%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • EF
    Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -83%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
2
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
3
Dyslexia Center of Utah New Heights Inc

We inspire and transform students with learning differences into confident, independent, and successful readers. We collaborate with colleagues and members of the community for the welfare and value of our diverse learners.

Education
4
Utah Arts Academy

Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education
5
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
6
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
7
Utah Donor Collaborative

Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.

—
8
Comunidades Unidas

We are dedicated to empowering the Latino community in Utah to recognize and achieve their own potential and become a positive force for change in the larger community.

Human Services
9
Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

Community Improvement
10
Utah Safety Council

The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
12
Central Utah Enterprises

To provide services to disabled persons with a focus on assisting individuals in Utah County with cognitive disabilities gain skills to enable them to enter the workforce.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ycc Family Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Excellence in the Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $302,131 · EducationOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATIONWeber County School District Foundation: $73,156 · EducationWeber County School District Foundation+1 more: $250 · EducationONSTAGE OGDEN: $37,000 · OtherONSTAGE OGDENWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $34,000 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientECCLES ART CENTER: $25,000 · OtherECCLES ART CENTERINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATIONWEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT: $18,000 · OtherWEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMEN…FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $16,000 · OtherFAMILY COUNSELING CENTERWEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT FUND: $15,000 · OtherWEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMEN…ST ANNE'S CENTER: $14,500 · OtherJOYCE HANSEN HALL FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $42,500 · Other+8 moreBALLET WEST: $162,500 · Arts & CultureBALLET WESTECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNS…YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY C…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPA…Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $15,000 · Human ServicesEncircle Fam…RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesGREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR: $44,000 · AnimalsENABLEUTAH INC: $20,000 · EmploymentSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $11,000 · Health
Education$375,537Other$279,500Arts & Culture$170,000Human Services$112,500Animals$44,000Employment$20,000Health$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $302,131 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetBALLET WEST: $162,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWeber County School District Foundation: $73,156 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR: $44,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $40,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetONSTAGE OGDEN: $37,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetENABLEUTAH INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $14,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $11,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $7,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXCELLENCE IN THE COMMUNITY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
  • Who funds Weber County School District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ONSTAGE OGDEN ↗
  • Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENABLEUTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds WEBER COUNTY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
  • Who funds ECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah ↗
  • Who funds EXCELLENCE IN THE COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alan and Jeanne H…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Donnell B & Elizabeth…Sorenson Legacy Found…Ihc Health Services I…George S and Dolores …The Community Foundat…Douglas & Shelley Fel…Nebeker Family Founda…Pacificorp Foundation…Ralph Nye Charitable …C Scott & Dorothy E W…
The Alan and Jeanne Hall FoundationUT30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Donnell B & Elizabeth D Stewart Education Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Douglas & Shelley Felt Family Found · Nebeker Family Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Ralph Nye Charitable Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beaver Creek Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beaver Creek Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beaver Creek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home