Skip to content
Beaumont Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Beaumont Health Foundation

To improve health, instill humanity and inspire hope.

$32M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$23M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$128MYouth Development$682kEducation$55kArts & Culture$50kCommunity Improvement$30kHousing & Shelter$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $27,950,331, the rows itemized in this filing. The $31,776,558 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,826,227 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $91k
  • $250k+3 grants · $28M
$25,649
Median grant
2
States reached
$221M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL$22,650,395
OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC$4,680,618
THE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC$372,016
OAKWOOD HEALTH PROMOTIONS$90,653
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY$35,000
THE COMMUNITY HOUSE ASSOCIATION$30,000
BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL$25,649
GREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$10,000
WOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR & SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$10,000
LIFE DIRECTIONS$10,000
MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT$10,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA INC$10,000
RACING FOR KIDS TO THE HILL$10,000
NF FORWARD$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $300k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128M · 5 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$128M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+4%

Still filing today

20%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WB
    WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $93M · revenue +0%
  • OH
    OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32M · revenue +5%
  • BG
    BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -47%
  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
3
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
4
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
5
Teenworks Inc

To empower teens to achieve excellence in college, career, and community.

Employment
6
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
7
Michigan Credit Union Foundation

Cooperatively empowering credit unions to increase financial well-being by supporting community enrichment, financial education, and credit union development initiatives

Public Benefit
8
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
9
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
10
Michigan Freedom Fund

To educate the public on issues concerning fiscal responsibility, economic freedom, and the elimination of coercive and compulsory policies; promote these issues; and support legislative changes to embrace these issues.

—
11
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
12
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women of Tomorrow Mentor & Scholarship Program Detroit Metro; the most unlike its peers is Nfx. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $93,164,414 · HealthWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITALOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC: $32,271,257 · HealthOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC+3 more: $2,100,000 · HealthTHE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $672,016 · Human ServicesHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · OtherWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR & SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM DETROIT METRO: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT: $10,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $10,000 · EducationLIFE DIRECTIONS: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTEEN STREET SKILLS: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$127,535,671Human Services$672,016Arts & Culture$50,000Other$45,000Community Improvement$30,000Education$20,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $93,164,414 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC: $32,271,257 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1,934,053 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $672,016 over 2y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR & SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM DETROIT METRO: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE DIRECTIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTEEN STREET SKILLS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNFX: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …DTE Energy FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beaumont Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beaumont Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beaumont Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home