Skip to content

· Public charity

Beaumont Foundation of America

The BEAUMONT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA awards grants to bring about civic betterment and social improvements by providing assistance to the poor, underserved, and underprivileged.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.7MHealth$3.1MHuman Services$1.7MEducation$1.6MReligion$102kCrime & Legal$50kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 49 grants below total $4,008,969, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,335,334 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $326,365 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $403k
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$213M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$648,619
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX$150,000
DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER$102,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$100,000
EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER$100,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$100,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$100,000
SAN AUGUSTINE HS COLLEGE SCHOLARSHI$100,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$100,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$100,000
SOME OTHER PLACE$80,000
NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS$80,000
SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$75,000
UPBRING$68,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 9%GALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $50k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $77k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $31k → 16%CARITAS OF WACO: $50k → 16%ST NICHOLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 17%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $12k → 9%GALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $30k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $67k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $30k → 16%CARITAS OF WACO: $50k → 16%ST NICHOLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 17%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $12k → 9%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $27k → 10%GALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $30k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $67k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $30k → 16%CARITAS OF WACO: $50k → 16%ST NICHOLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 17%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $12k → 9%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $24k → 10%GALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $30k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $66k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $30k → 16%CARITAS OF WACO: $50k → 16%ST NICHOLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 17%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $24k → 10%ANGEL REACH: $30k → 9%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $23k → 10%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $116k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $102k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $83k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $83k → 16%UPBRING: $120k → 10%UPBRING: $120k → 10%UPBRING: $84k → 10%UPBRING: $69k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX: $150k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $80k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $80k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $80k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $80k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX: $50k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX: $50k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX: $50k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $50k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FAMILY RESOURCE CEN: $10k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FAMILY RESOURCE CEN: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 47 repeat orgs$273k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
6

Total granted

$16M
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+21%

Still filing today

77%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +166%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +28%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UL
    UT LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • GH
    Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -11%
  • TS
    TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
2
Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

—
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
5
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
6
Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry

The mission of the Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry and Support Center is to serve Bastrop County residents going through periods of transition by providing emergency food assistance, education and support.

—
7
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Food Bank of San Benito County

Our mission is to provide food, nutritional education, and advocacy for those in need within san benito county, while pursuing our ultimate vision that no resident will suffer from hunger or malnutrition in san benito county.

Education
11
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
12
Food Bank of Rio Grande Valley Inc

The Food Bank of the Rio Grande Valley is passionately committed to improving lives through food assistance, nutrition education,and access to community services across the tri-county area of the lower Rio Grande Valley.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Msgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
27/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,398,209 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN AUGUSTINE HS COLLEGE SCHOLARSHI: $500,000 · OtherSAN AUGUSTINE HS COLLEGE SCHOLARSHINORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $400,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKTarrant Area Food Bank: $400,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankThe Houston Food Bank: $400,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $400,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $263,500 · OtherLAMAR UNIVERSITY: $210,000 · Other+17 more: $1,159,081 · Other+17 moreHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATIONLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $393,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE…DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $382,500 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CE…NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $320,000 · Human ServicesNUTRITION AND SERVICES …Some Other Place: $320,000 · Human ServicesSome Other PlaceSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $300,000 · Human ServicesSoutheast Texas Food Ba…Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $300,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of S…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $276,600 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMI…CARITAS OF WACO: $200,000 · Human ServicesCARITAS OF WACOGALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $140,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $139,200 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $121,200 · Human Services+6 more: $354,200 · Human Services+6 moreEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $400,000 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS F…Central Texas Food Bank Inc: $400,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texa…COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $200,000 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL BEND…SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $200,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS…WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $140,000 · Food & NutritionWICHITA FALL…THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $140,000 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNIT…Food Bank of West Central Texas: $140,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of…BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $120,000 · Food & NutritionBRAZOS VALLE…Msgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc: $285,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $240,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $163,156 · EducationTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $40,000 · EducationSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $120,000 · Community ImprovementMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$6,130,790Health$4,000,000Human Services$3,246,700Food & Nutrition$1,740,000Education$728,156Community Improvement$120,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $400,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $393,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $382,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $320,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSome Other Place: $320,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $300,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $300,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetMsgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc: $285,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $276,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONAL EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS OF WACO: $200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $163,156 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank: $140,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $140,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $140,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $140,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $140,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $139,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $121,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $98,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST NICHOLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $80,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $55,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSoutheast Texas Family Resource Center Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX27.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Feeding Texas · Texas Bankers Foundation · Feeding America · First Community Foundation Inc · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Houston Food Bank · Charities Aid Foundation America · Collaborative for Fresh Produce · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beaumont Foundation of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beaumont Foundation of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Beaumont Foundation of America?

    Find your warmest path to Beaumont Foundation of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beaumont Foundation of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph