Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Beagary Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$2.6MArts & Culture$1.9MRecreation & Sports$381kHuman Services$292kHousing & Shelter$165kYouth Development$134kPhilanthropy$130kAnimals$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $287k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $874k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ARTS CENTER$166,666
KILLINGLY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$150,500
POMFRET SCHOOL$100,000
Individual grant recipient$84,000
RECTORY SCHOOL$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM$60,000
GRISWOLD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$57,500
PLAINFIELD HIGH SCHOOL$55,200
OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE MUSEUM$50,000
PUTNAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS$49,100
MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM$45,000
YMCA OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD$30,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFTS FUND$30,000
HALE YMCA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $50k → 11%SALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 43 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
9

Total granted

$5.7M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+67%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $571k · revenue +112%
  • BM
    BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $424k · revenue +379%
  • MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $218k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • PP
    PROMFRET PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • RT
    RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newburyport Maritime Society Inc

To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History

Arts & Culture
2
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

3
Martha's Vineyard Agricultural Society Inc

The martha's vineyard agricultural society supports a resilient and sustainable agricultural community on martha's vineyard. we do this by:- offering services, education, marketing, and technical support for farmers and farmworkers on the…

Recreation & Sports
4
Victoria Mansion

Preserve/Maintain Victoria Mansion

Arts & Culture
5
Mystic Museum of Art Inc

The Mystic Museum of Art is an educational non-profit, non-stock corporation. Its mission is to inspire creativity and critical dialogue by engaging the regional community in understanding, appreciation, and practice of visual art.

Arts & Culture
6
Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association

Pvma promotes the history of the connecticut and deerfield river valley.

7
Nantucket Historical Association

The nantucket historical association preserves and interprets the history of nantucket through its programs, collections, and properties, in order to promote the island's significance and foster an appreciation of it among all audiences.

Arts & Culture
8
Florence Griswold Museum Inc

The florence griswold museum seeks to promote a greater understanding of connecticut's contribution to american art and history through public exhibitions and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
9
The Marblehead Arts Association Inc

To promote appreciation of the fine and applied arts

Arts & Culture
10
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
11
Artists Association of Nantucket Inc

To foster the visual arts on nantucket, to promote, support and encourage the work of nantucket artists, providing educational programs in the arts, preserving the legacy of nantucket artists, and to create a vibrant arts community.

Arts & Culture
12
Preserve Rhode Island

Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northeast Opportunities for Wellness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent Secondary Schoo…Local History PreservationProvincetown Community Deve…Cape Cod Community Developm…Food Pantries and Meal Prog…Local Education ScholarshipsCemetery AssociationsPet Rescue and AdoptionFraternal Service Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Martha's Vineyard Community…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr20%12%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr17%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr20%7%20–35yr15%62%35–55yr17%31%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
9%
411/4,447

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOODSTOCK ACADEMY — $1,190,185 · OtherWOODSTOCK ACADEMYKILLINGLY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $697,320 · OtherKILLINGLY PUBLIC SCHOOLSOLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE MUSEUM — $207,000 · OtherOLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherBROOKLYN PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $134,107 · OtherHALE YMCA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER — $132,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFTS FUND — $130,000 · Other+34 more — $821,063 · Other+34 moreMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $571,466 · Arts & CultureMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM IN…BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC — $424,166 · Arts & CultureBRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CE…MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC — $217,600 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INCMARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST INC — $135,750 · Arts & CultureMARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVAT…SAIL MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC — $55,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $29,500 · Arts & CulturePOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $300,000 · EducationTHE RECTORY SCHOOL INC — $125,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc — $192,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $3,500 · Recreation & SportsHabitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc — $165,000 · Housing & ShelterSALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesAnimal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc — $3,000 · Animals
Other$3,486,675Arts & Culture$1,433,482Education$426,000Recreation & Sports$195,500Housing & Shelter$165,000Human Services$100,000Animals$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOODSTOCK ACADEMY — $1,190,185 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $571,466 over 6y, 11% of budgetBRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC — $424,166 over 6y, 11% of budgetPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC — $217,600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc — $192,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc — $165,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST INC — $135,750 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE RECTORY SCHOOL INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAIL MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC — $55,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetPUTNAM CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $16,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $14,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQVCC FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHEAST OPPORTUNITIES FOR WELLNESS INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAnimal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFEATHERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPutnam Lodge of Elks #574 — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ASSISI FOOD PANTRY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILMARK PRE-SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODSTOCK ACADEMY
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC
  • Who funds POMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds YMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST INC
  • Who funds THE RECTORY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds SALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds SAIL MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC
  • Who funds PUTNAM CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC
  • Who funds QVCC FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centreville Savings Bank Charitable FoundationRI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Dickinson Family Foundation Inc · Hoerle Foundation Inc · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Hometown Bank Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · SPIROL International Charitable Foundation Inc · Pearson-Rappaport Foundation · Newell D Hale Foundation · Alden Charitable Foundation Inc · The Stanton Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Beagary Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc30% of income from government
  • Salem Community Corporation7% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc5% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc4% of income from government
  • Woodstock Academy3% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Museum & Art Centerinc1% of income from government
  • Sail Martha's Vineyard Inc1% of income from government
  • Putnam Cemetery Association1% of income from government
  • The Rectory School Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph