Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beacon of Hope Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$508kHuman Services$218kFood & Nutrition$92kCommunity Improvement$57kReligion$37kHealth$36kHousing & Shelter$33kEmployment$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVE COLUMBIA$87,668
YES ACADEMY$25,157
COLUMBIA CENTER FOR URBAN$12,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$3,288
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BOLD ACADEMY$2,000
SHOES FROM THE HEART$1,000
ST MARY'S STAR OF THE SEA$584
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $196k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHOES FROM THE HEART: $1k → 14%BE THE VILLAGE: $2k → 19%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $500 → 10%DESTINY OF HOPE: $25k → 17%MANASOTA SOLVE: $500 → 10%DESTINY OF HOPE: $10k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $88k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $34k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $16k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA INC: $10k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Beacon of Hope Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Beacon of Hope Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$881k · 27 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
38

Total granted

$881k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+8%

Still filing today

19%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia
    5× · 2021–2025 · $157k · revenue +59%
  • CC
    Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture
    3× · 2020–2022 · $38k · revenue +103%
  • LC
    Lorton Community Action Center Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
2
Family Promise in Anoka County

Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.

Human Services
3
Compassion Corps

Compassion Corps is engaged in mobilizing others to carry hope relief and opportunity into regions of Africa plagued by fear and despair through partnership with indigenous Africans in their holistic efforts of compassion.

International
4
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
5
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
6
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
7
Cumberland Crisis Pregnancy Center

Valuing all human life, the ccpc provides hope to those experiencing an unplanned pregnancy, ministers healing to those who have experienced abortion and upholds truth to the community through sexual risk avoidance education.

Health
8
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
9
Bishop Sullivan Center Inc

Inspired by Christian faith, Bishop Sullivan Center shows God's love to people in financial hardship by providing food, help in finding jobs, and other aid. Beyond material assistance, Bishop Sulivan Center strives to build relationships…

Human Services
10
Columbia Housing Center Inc

To champion and sustain thriving, racially-integrated communities in and around columbia, maryland.

Housing & Shelter
11
Fellowship Housing Corporation

We demonstrate and extend the love and compassion of Jesus Christ to at-risk single moms and their children while equipping them to live independently through reduced cost housing, financial literacy training, scholarships and other…

Housing & Shelter
12
Loving Arms - a Crisis Pregnancy Center

Sharing the love of christ while promoting sexual integrity and bringing life affirming services to those unprepared for pregnancy or hurt by abortion

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Pregnancy Clinics Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jugaad Leadership Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $112,088 · OtherGRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGRANNY'S HOUSE: $98,973 · OtherGRANNY'S HOUSEWEST MIDDLE SCHOOL: $66,032 · OtherWEST MIDDLE SCHOOLYES ACADEMY: $42,221 · OtherYES ACADEMYCOLUMBIA CENTER FOR URBAN: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherSOLVE MATERNITY HOMES: $32,383 · OtherST MARY'S STAR OF THE SEA: $28,856 · Other+49 more: $330,072 · Other+49 moreLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $157,330 · Human ServicesLove Columbia Corp Lo…Destiny of HOPE: $35,000 · Human ServicesDestiny of HOPE+4 more: $3,919 · Human ServicesColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $37,519 · Environment+1 more: $496 · EnvironmentEDUCATE FAIRFAX: $4,120 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $2,517 · EducationSOMERSET CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $519 · EducationSTILLPOINT MISSION INC: $900 · Religion
Other$783,125Human Services$196,249Environment$38,015Education$7,156Religion$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $157,330 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $37,519 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetDestiny of HOPE: $35,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetThe American Legion: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE FAIRFAX: $4,120 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $2,517 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLorton Community Action Center Inc: $1,992 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBE THE VILLAGE INC: $1,919 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHOES FROM THE HEART: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTILLPOINT MISSION INC: $900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOMERSET CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $519 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANASOTA-SOLVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMB CENTER: $496 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture ↗
  • Who funds Destiny of HOPE ↗
  • Who funds The American Legion ↗
  • Who funds JUGAAD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE FAIRFAX ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beacon of Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beacon of Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Beacon of Hope Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Beacon of Hope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beacon of Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph