· Private foundation
Bea Aldrink Idema Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k22 grants · $427k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $460k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $250,000 |
| GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| KIDS HOPE USA INC | $100,000 |
| VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $60,000 |
| JOSEPH PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| NEW CITY NETWORKS | $50,000 |
| THE POTTER'S HOUSE | $50,000 |
| ODC NETWORK | $50,000 |
| GRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY SOCIETY | $35,000 |
| CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING & HORSEMANSHIP | $25,000 |
| LOUISVILLE YOUTH ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PARTNERSHIP C-SNIP | $25,000 |
| UPCYCLE BIKES | $25,000 |
| THE STOREHOUSE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $25,000 |
| WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $437k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KHKids Hope USA3× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +50%
NEW CITY KIDS INC4× · 2020–2024 · $157k · revenue +16%- TPThe Potters House3× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- WPWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DBA CAMP HENRYone grant, 2024 · $500k
- CHCAMP HENRY A MINISTRY OF WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $100k
- HCHOPE COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Equipping students to serve and glorify God. GCCS offers a Christ-centered education that is grounded in faith, connected through relationships, committed to excellence and prepared for service.
The Good Shepherd Catholic Montessori is dedicated to providing an outstanding education to children ages three to fourteen in a catholic atmosphere faithful to the magisterium of the church. Using the philosophy and techniques of the…
To help disadvantaged youth transform their lives by providing learning experiences in a fun and safe christian environment, free of charge.
Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…
To educate and inspire this generation to impact the culture for christ. lcs operates an early learning center, discovery cottage, collaborative school, preschool, kindergarten, elementary, middle and high school. summer camps are offered.…
To develop biomedical research leaders through a graduate program in molecular and cell biology.
The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…
We believe that the first six years of a childs life are the most critical. We offer a high quality learning environment to a diverse community of children and families.
To operate a private school for age 3 through eighth grade students.
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
The school's objective is to provide an excellent, christ-centered education, equipping students for a life of scholarship, leadership, and service.
Educate each student in spirit, mind and body by fostering personal excellence within the Catholic tradition.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Intervention Services and the most unlike its peers is Bethasda Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kids Hope USA ↗
- Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds The Potters House ↗
- Who funds VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UPCYCLE BIKES ↗
- Who funds VAN ANDEL EDUCATION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds STOREHOUSE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds New City Networks ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE JOSEPH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CATHERINES HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds 21ST CENTURY PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY RESEARCH TRIANGLE HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP LIVING WATERS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
- Who funds Bethasda Farm ↗
- Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WEST MICHIGAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · The Wege Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Jerry & Marcia Tubergen Foundation · The David and Carol Van Andel Family Foundation · Corewell Health Group Return · The Meijer Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bea Aldrink Idema Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bea Aldrink Idema Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bea Aldrink Idema Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.