Skip to content
Be in McCormack Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Be in McCormack Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Youth Development$200kHealth$149kRecreation & Sports$113kReligion$89kCommunity Improvement$50kEducation$20kAnimals$10kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$35,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNTAPPED TALENT IMPACT DBA STREET CHILD UNITED$100,000
DENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORP$45,000
ONE LIFE MINISTRIES$35,000
HOUSE OF HOPE$25,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$18,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $34k → 12%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $3k → 16%ONE LIFE MINISTRIES: $35k → 10%TRUE AND FAITHFUL PET RESCUE: $5k → 9%VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $1k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE ORLANDO INC: $100k → 13%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7k → 15%TELLING THE TRUTH: $3k → 5%FOCUS ON FAMILY: $5k → 9%UNTAPPED TALENT IMPACT DBA STREET CHILD UNITED: $100k → 9%WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $20k → 15%HOME FOR VETERANS: $1k → 7%ONE LIFE MINISTRIES: $20k → 10%SARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 9%HOUSE OF HOPE: $80k → 13%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 15%STREET PSALMS: $5k → 9%VINTAGE PAWS SANTUARY: $5k → 9%HOUSE OF HOPE: $25k → 13%LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $50k → 9%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $18k → 13%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $8k → 13%DENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORP: $45k → 13%DENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORP: $30k → 13%DENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORP: $26k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Be in McCormack Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Be in McCormack Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 5 repeat orgs$342k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$298k
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+14%

Still filing today

40%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $105k
  • DJ
    DENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $101k
  • OL
    One Life Ministries
    2× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE ORLANDO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -43%
  • LF
    LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +33%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
    one grant, 2022 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Intimate Life Ministries
—
2
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
3
One in the Spirit Ministries
Religion
4
Oasis Ministries
Religion
5
Spiritual Light Ministries
Religion
6
Source of Hope Ministries
Religion
7
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
8
Transform Ministries
—
9
The Life Connection Inc
Religion
10
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
11
Life Ministries

Life ministries existes to shepherd people in a process of discoverying god's heart through teaching, writing, and spiritual direction in order to usher freedom through jesus christ.

—
12
Pwf Ministries
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Hope Orlando Inc; the most unlike its peers is One Life Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSE OF HOPE: $105,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPEDENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORP: $100,500 · OtherDENTON JOHNSON TENNIS CORPUNTAPPED TALENT IMPACT DBA STREET CHILD UNITED: $100,000 · OtherUNTAPPED TALENT IMPACT DBA STREET CHILD UNITEDUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $34,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $25,500 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST+4 more: $12,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPE ORLANDO INC: $100,000 · ReligionHOUSE OF HOPE ORLANDO INCOne Life Ministries: $55,000 · ReligionOne Life Ministries+2 more: $8,000 · ReligionLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $50,000 · Community ImprovementWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationSARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,000 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentVINTAGE PAWS SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$377,000Religion$163,000Community Improvement$50,000Education$20,000Health$13,000Youth Development$12,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSE OF HOPE ORLANDO INC: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTREET PSALMS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVINTAGE PAWS SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTELLING THE TRUTH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Be in McCormack Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Be in McCormack Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Be in McCormack Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Be in McCormack Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Be in McCormack’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home