Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bdh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$430kHuman Services$207kPhilanthropy$125kEducation$52kHealth$33kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH$20,000
TEN YAD HACHNASAS KALLAH$18,000
HURWITZ FAMILY FUND$17,000
CHABAD OF YONKERS$6,000
SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV$6,000
INTERN COMM FOR THE PRESERVATION OF HAR HAZEISIM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WISCONSIN$5,000
CHABAD OF UNION COUNTY$5,000
DAAT CENTER$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $25k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $25k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $20k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $20k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $20k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $20k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $18k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $18k → 20%TEHILLAT NAAVA-SHLACH LACHMECHA: $1k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $20k → 20%KFAR YELADIM DAVID: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$725k · 17 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
43

Total granted

$725k
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+22%

Still filing today

18%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    Keren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah
    9× · 2017–2025 · $186k · revenue +16%
  • THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $28k · revenue +388%
  • DC
    DAAT CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +3%
  • I
    ICHH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • GK
    GOODNESS KINDNESS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
5
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
8
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
9
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
10
Kollel Ner Naftali

Kollel Ner Naftalis purpose is to address, educate and coordinate the facilitation of jewish related programs in an effort to further the religious practice of judaism.

Religion
11
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
12
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nefesh Yehudie Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gmach Hatzoloh of Rockland County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEN YAD HACHNASAS KALLAH: $162,000 · OtherTEN YAD HACHNASAS KALLAHHURWITZ FAMILY FUND: $124,500 · OtherHURWITZ FAMILY FUNDNEFESH YEHUDA INC: $66,000 · OtherNEFESH YEHUDA INCCHABAD OF YONKERS INC: $33,600 · OtherSIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV: $30,620 · OtherCHABAD OF UNION COUNTY: $29,100 · Other+44 more: $207,310 · Other+44 moreKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $186,000 · Human ServicesKeren Simchas Chosson V…+2 more: $2,800 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $25,000 · ReligionDAAT CENTER INC: $12,200 · ReligionNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $5,000 · ReligionTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $27,900 · EducationYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $10,000 · EducationGMACH HATZOLOH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $1,000 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,800 · Arts & CultureCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,800 · Health
Other$653,130Human Services$188,800Religion$42,200Education$37,900Philanthropy$2,000Arts & Culture$1,800Health$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $186,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $27,900 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetDAAT CENTER INC: $12,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKFAR YELADIM DAVID INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGMACH HATZOLOH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Keren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC ↗
  • Who funds DAAT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEFESH YEHUDIE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YAD V'EIZER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALUMNI OF THE RABBINICAL COLLEGE KNESSETH ISRAEL OF SLABODKA KOWNA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY27.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Jmg Foundation · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bdh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bdh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bdh’s filings →

More from the funding graph