Skip to content
Baylor Health Care System Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including sponsorship of specific projects and programs, as recommended by the health care system and its affiliate…

$43M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$447MEmployment$6.0M
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $42,326,095, the rows itemized in this filing. The $43,220,770 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $894,675 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $379k
  • $250k+8 grants · $42M
$201,136
Median grant
1
States reached
$524M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baylor University Medical Center$24,868,097
Baylor Research Institute$10,380,334
Baylor Scott & White Health$2,569,530
Southern Sector Health Initiative$1,314,901
HealthTexas Provider Network$947,125
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers-Greater North Texas$782,769
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano$580,626
Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie$387,871
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine$201,136
Baylor Medical Center at Irving$93,046
Baylor All Saints Medical Center$85,303
Scott & White Memorial Hospital$41,599
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Centennial$25,195
Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center$16,768
Lake Pointe Operating Company LLC$11,351
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano: $558k → 5%Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie: $908k → 9%Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie: $652k → 9%Baylor Research Institute: $15.6M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $13.1M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $10.9M → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $1.8M → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $1.2M → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $1.2M → 14%Baylor Medical Centers at Garland and McKinney: $582k → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $18.3M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $6.0M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $5.4M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $42.6M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $41.2M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $36.5M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $24.9M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $24.8M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $24.0M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $22.9M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $21.7M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $20.1M → 14%Baylor University Medical Center: $18.6M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $10.9M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $10.4M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $9.3M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $8.7M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $8.5M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $8.4M → 14%Baylor Research Institute: $7.8M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $3.3M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $2.6M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $2.6M → 14%Baylor Scott & White Health: $2.6M → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $1.5M → 14%Southern Sector Health Initiative: $1.3M → 14%Scott & White Memorial Hospital: $1.1M → 14%Southern Sector Health Initiative: $1.1M → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $947k → 14%Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano: $918k → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $906k → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $866k → 14%Southern Sector Health Initiative: $865k → 14%Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers-Greater North Texas: $783k → 14%HealthTexas Provider Network: $673k → 14%Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine: $632k → 14%Southern Sector Health Initiative: $623k → 14%Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano: $581k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$453M · 18 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$453M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    Baylor University Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235M · revenue +83%
  • BS
    Baylor Scott & White Health
    9× · 2017–2025 · $94M · revenue +45%
  • BR
    Baylor Research Institute
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SW
    Scott & White Hospital Brenham
    one grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue +12%
  • BS
    Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Areagraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +37%
  • SW
    Scott & White Hospital-Taylor
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scott & White Clinic

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Baylor Health Care System

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Scott & White Healthcare

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Philanthropy
4
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
5
Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
6
Scott & White Ems Inc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Hillcrest Family Health Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Hillcrest Physician Services

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
All Saints Health Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center-Fort Worth, to encourage broad-based public support, and to advance medical objectives, including sponsorship or patient care, research,…

Health
10
Scott & White Foundation Brenham

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Brenham, to encourage broad-based public support of Baylor Scott & White Health, and to advance its medical objectives, including patient care, and…

Health
11
Irving Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Medical Center at Irving, to encourage broad-based public support, and to advance its medical objectives including sponsorship of patient care, research, and educational and…

Health
12
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scott & White Hospital-College Station; the most unlike its peers is Baylor Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Baylor University Medical Center: $234,695,250 · HealthBaylor University Medical CenterBaylor Scott & White Health: $94,288,474 · HealthBaylor Scott & White HealthBaylor Research Institute: $92,515,998 · HealthBaylor Research Institute+20 more: $31,473,463 · Health+20 moreBaylor Medical Center at Carrollton: $313,419 · Other
Health$452,973,185Other$313,419

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor University Medical Center: $234,695,250 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Health: $94,288,474 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetBaylor Research Institute: $92,515,998 over 9y, 22% of budgetHealthTexas Provider Network: $9,283,449 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Sector Health Initiative: $5,453,378 over 9y, 17% of budgetBaylor Medical Center at Waxahachie: $3,420,574 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBaylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine: $3,197,365 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor Regional Medical Center at Plano: $3,016,678 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas: $3,002,366 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetScott & White Memorial Hospital: $1,677,798 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor All Saints Medical Center: $1,089,015 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Medical Center at Irving: $536,894 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Medical Center at Carrollton: $313,419 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial: $161,359 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLake Pointe Operating Company LLC: $152,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Hospital Round Rock: $150,915 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHillcrest Baptist Medical Center: $129,952 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Hospital-College Station: $118,605 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Hospital Brenham: $20,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area: $18,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Hospital-Taylor: $13,205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Hospital-Marble Falls: $11,662 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Holdings: $10,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Continuing Care Hospital: $7,278 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scott & White Healthc…Baylor Medical Center…Texas Essential Healt…All Saints Health Fou…Irving Healthcare Fou…Scott & White Healthc…Baylor University
Scott & White Healthcare FoundationTX32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scott & White Healthcare Foundation · Baylor Medical Center at Carrollton · Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation · All Saints Health Foundation · Irving Healthcare Foundation · Scott & White Healthcare · Baylor University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baylor Health Care System Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baylor Health Care System Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baylor Health Care System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home