Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bauer Erwin C Char Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$155kArts & Culture$103kPublic Benefit$29kEducation$23kEnvironment$12kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$7kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MADISON FOUNDATION INC$25,000
TOWN OF MADISON$8,000
VIBE SHOW CHOIR SUPPORTERS$5,000
ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT$5,000
MADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC$4,000
WOMEN AND FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF GUILFORD$2,000
COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED$2,000
DEACON JOHNGRAVE FOUNDATION INC$2,000
E C SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 9 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$179k
$5k

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TOWN OF MADISON
    6× · 2020–2025 · $39k
  • AF
    ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +94%
  • MH
    MADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue -43%

Funded once

  • DH
    DANIEL HAND HIGH SCHOOL ECO CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF MADISON
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • SS
    SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS PANTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison County Historical Society
Arts & Culture
2
Madison Art Gallery
—
3
Milford Historical Society
—
4
Manchester Historical Society Inc

The manchester historical society educates the public about the history of manchester, connecticut; collects, preserves, interprets, and exhibits information and artifacts about the town and its diverse population, and advocates for the…

Arts & Culture
5
Madison County Historical Society

To preserve, collect, promote and exhibit the history of Madison County and it's 15 towns and one 15 towns and one city

Arts & Culture
6
Middletown Historical Society State of Rhode Island

Historical preservation of places buildings parks and other middletown artifacts for the enjoyment of middletown citizens and other visitors to the town

—
7
Winchester Historical Society
—
8
Historical Society of Middletown & Wallkill
—
9
New London Heritage Historical Society Inc

Preserve New London WI Heritage and History

—
10
Middlesex County Historical Society

To maintain middlesex county's historical integrity and to educate and provide programs to the public to increase their understanding of the area's past.

Arts & Culture
11
Madison Museum of Contemporary Art Inc

Promote modern, contemporary art through exhibitions, educational programs, and collecting.

Arts & Culture
12
Madison Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation Inc

To administer investments and receive support for the exclusive benefit of the madison museum of contemporary art, inc.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Madison Historical Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Deacon John Grave Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MADISON FOUNDATION: $155,000 · HealthTHE MADISON FOUNDATIONARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT: $37,800 · Arts & CultureARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUTMADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $37,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCDEACON JOHN GRAVE FOUNDATION INC: $19,700 · Arts & CultureDEACON JOHN GRAVE FOUNDATION INCWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC+1 more: $3,333 · Arts & CultureTOWN OF MADISON: $39,451 · OtherTOWN OF MADISONEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL …HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $3,000 · Other+4 more: $4,500 · Other+4 moreMADISON'S NITE IN HAND: $7,000 · EducationVIBE SHOW CHOIR SUPPORTERS IN: $5,000 · EducationTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Education
Health$155,000Arts & Culture$109,333Other$66,951Education$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MADISON FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT: $37,800 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $37,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $20,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDEACON JOHN GRAVE FOUNDATION INC: $19,700 over 6y, 24% of budgetWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMADISON'S NITE IN HAND: $7,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MADISON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT ↗
  • Who funds MADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds EC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds DEACON JOHN GRAVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON'S NITE IN HAND ↗
  • Who funds VIBE SHOW CHOIR SUPPORTERS IN ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE L EVARTS MEMORIAL ARCHIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lucy FoundationNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lucy Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bauer Erwin C Char Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bauer Erwin C Char Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Arts for Learning Connecticut: 14% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bauer Erwin C Char Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph